Hawking is somehow surprising and not surprising. Given that he was a paraplegic and all. He always seemed fake to me, like he was a manufactured feelgood story from 80s news.
For me, whether he wrote his own work of if he was just a golem for the bad guys, I find the man most useful for discrediting "Science!", because of his recanting black holes before his death.
Besides disproving galactic red shift recently, there hasn't been a more interesting piece of astrophysics in a decade at least.
Basically, galactic red shift being disproven means that the universe isn't expanding infinitely, because not only is movement not observed but a lack of movement was.
Since the galaxy isn't expanding, there cannot have been a single point of origin. No big bang. Probably THE pre-eminent theory used to push atheism in the 20th century was a lie all along.
Hawking is somehow surprising and not surprising. Given that he was a paraplegic and all. He always seemed fake to me, like he was a manufactured feelgood story from 80s news.
I enjoyed Hawking’s work but it made me really sad to see he was so opposed to the idea of a creator
For me, whether he wrote his own work of if he was just a golem for the bad guys, I find the man most useful for discrediting "Science!", because of his recanting black holes before his death.
Besides disproving galactic red shift recently, there hasn't been a more interesting piece of astrophysics in a decade at least.
I need to read up on that
Basically, galactic red shift being disproven means that the universe isn't expanding infinitely, because not only is movement not observed but a lack of movement was.
Since the galaxy isn't expanding, there cannot have been a single point of origin. No big bang. Probably THE pre-eminent theory used to push atheism in the 20th century was a lie all along.