You guys will love this article, they absolutely hate him, they're already trying to keep accusing him of a dictator because of the changes he's implementing and how he's dismantling the state. Which is fucking funny because dictators never dismantle the state and do away with whole institutions they usually pack them with loyalists.
Cope and seethe statists, I'm very curious as to the actual economic impact this will all have. We're going to have to simply wait and see through the year but unlike Trump he seems to have a very real understanding of what his enemies are like and knows he has to simply get rid of everything in order to affect any kind of real change day to day.
This is something that needs to happen across the board, exterminatus is the only viable solution.
I don't get it. What's the complaint here?
I'm a Militarist Minarchist American Liberal.
Argentina is a Socialist state trying to Liberalize. They are stuck hard within the American sphere of influence (as they have been for over 50 years).
These are strategies that point in the right direction. I'm not going to be autistic, when clearly we can look to Hoppe to identify that practicality to move towards individual liberty is still a good direction.
There's nothing minarchist about tying your country's future to some other country's fiat currency. It sounds, dare I say, globalist even.
You will when you need to rail against White people doing what we need to do. The on/off switch only makes you more obviously malicious.
I'm not going to play "Autistic Libertarian" to someone who is successfully demolishing a Socialist state. Shits a work in progress bro.
I've never railed against white people and you know that.
You play "autistic libertarian" with immigration, of all fucking polices, and of all fucking times.
What the fuck are you talking about. The most autistic libertarian thing I've said about immigration is that a true libertarian immigration policy would inherently resist mass migration because you would be able to shoot all trespassers, and there could be no sponsorship of their movement.