It's still wrong to do, but whites will very likely preform the way overseas chinese, indians, koreans, and jews did: form parochial communities with tight family bonds for security & culture, focus on saving money and (real) education, and building families in order to create generational wealth. Works every time.
The government doesn't just want to exclude white people, it wants to annihilate them. I agree that parallel communities will help, but mostly in the sense that as huwhites bond tighter together they'll realize that their survival is at stake and actually start self-organizing.
Whites whom are dependent on these corrupt institutions will pull away or otherwise suffer. In the long term, the institutions will suffer a crisis of competency (see: Rhodesia), and will end up falling apart as a parallel economies are created.
Rhodesia/Zimbabwe is a cheery story, but not exactly in that model. The white people were actually booted out of the country, the fields went fallow, then they were invited back. So point A the whites didn't build a parallel institution, they mostly had to leave, and point B the happy ending is only possible because the government of Zimbabwe has some incentive to keep Zimbabwe alive. Western leaders, on the other hand, hate their own countries and applaud the suffering of their native populations.
The government doesn't just want to exclude white people, it wants to annihilate them. I agree that parallel communities will help, but mostly in the sense that as huwhites bond tighter together they'll realize that their survival is at stake and actually start self-organizing.
It doesn't, that's just the most recent rhetorical target of the 'bourgeois' classification. They'd be perfectly happy eliminating 'white' as a concept and replacing it with only sub-groups; that way they could go back to having the Irish and Italians bicker with Anglos, who could then be targeted as a different bourgeois group.
Alternatively, and this is why Richard Spencer is correct, they will adopt the "White Affinity Group" method. By intentionally "racializing" whites, they'll become another aspect to machine politics and identity politics. This is what he's waiting on. He knows, correctly, that white racialism will come to him sitting on the political Left, rather than try to subvert Conservativism on the right.
The white people were actually booted out of the country, the fields went fallow, then they were invited back.
Whites were not booted out of the country (as a whole). Their land was seized and re-distributed, and they were removed from positions of political power. Many whites left, but plenty stayed, and some voluntarily came back.
the happy ending is only possible because the government of Zimbabwe has some incentive to keep Zimbabwe alive. Western leaders, on the other hand, hate their own countries and applaud the suffering of their native populations.
Zimbabwe, South Africa, and the Black Congressional Caucus are run entirely by the same ideology. Certainly Zimbabweans hated their country because they scrapped the country and re-named it. Same with South Africa. Again, these Leftists do not want to kill every man, woman, and child in their country (they just lean towards that by default). At a certain point, something intervenes to stop that from happening (even if it's forgein communists like in Cambodia). Sometimes, like in Ethiopia, they just give up and realize they were spoon-fed bullshit (though this is rare).
The west wants to perpetuate the petro-dollar and maintain the pension racket. Eliminating the entire white race is not on the menu, or even a mild concern. White lives don't matter (to them).
The government doesn't just want to exclude white people, it wants to annihilate them. I agree that parallel communities will help, but mostly in the sense that as huwhites bond tighter together they'll realize that their survival is at stake and actually start self-organizing.
Rhodesia/Zimbabwe is a cheery story, but not exactly in that model. The white people were actually booted out of the country, the fields went fallow, then they were invited back. So point A the whites didn't build a parallel institution, they mostly had to leave, and point B the happy ending is only possible because the government of Zimbabwe has some incentive to keep Zimbabwe alive. Western leaders, on the other hand, hate their own countries and applaud the suffering of their native populations.
It doesn't, that's just the most recent rhetorical target of the 'bourgeois' classification. They'd be perfectly happy eliminating 'white' as a concept and replacing it with only sub-groups; that way they could go back to having the Irish and Italians bicker with Anglos, who could then be targeted as a different bourgeois group.
Alternatively, and this is why Richard Spencer is correct, they will adopt the "White Affinity Group" method. By intentionally "racializing" whites, they'll become another aspect to machine politics and identity politics. This is what he's waiting on. He knows, correctly, that white racialism will come to him sitting on the political Left, rather than try to subvert Conservativism on the right.
Whites were not booted out of the country (as a whole). Their land was seized and re-distributed, and they were removed from positions of political power. Many whites left, but plenty stayed, and some voluntarily came back.
Zimbabwe, South Africa, and the Black Congressional Caucus are run entirely by the same ideology. Certainly Zimbabweans hated their country because they scrapped the country and re-named it. Same with South Africa. Again, these Leftists do not want to kill every man, woman, and child in their country (they just lean towards that by default). At a certain point, something intervenes to stop that from happening (even if it's forgein communists like in Cambodia). Sometimes, like in Ethiopia, they just give up and realize they were spoon-fed bullshit (though this is rare).
The west wants to perpetuate the petro-dollar and maintain the pension racket. Eliminating the entire white race is not on the menu, or even a mild concern. White lives don't matter (to them).
Unless it's donors on Martha's Vineyard.