Firstly, I don't think there's a requirement in white nationalism to want other races dead. Certainly there are white nationalists who do want that, but I don't think it's a requirement. Surely wanting to empower your own race and have it embedded into the national identity would be the primary requirement, not whatever motives you've ascribed to it.
Anyway, it seems consistent to me that somebody who supports, on principle, a white nationalist identity could also sympathize with the struggle of others to achieve similar ends in their own countries, whether they are white or not. You can want certain kinds of migrants out of your country - or even just curbed in some way - without hating and wishing death upon their race generally. A 'not in my backyard' attitude of a sort.
To add to that, people are capable of holding complicated and nuanced views on complicated and nuanced matters, and that's not even accounting for the varying stages of propganda deprogramming - and information differentials - you'll see even within people who share a movement.
They are not obligated to become the caricature you need them to be.
If White Nationalism were nationalistic, I'd agree. They're not. They're just National Socialists. They are not interested in empowering any race. They are not interested in national identity.
As Socialists, jews are bourgeois race. As such, each jew must be killed, everywhere. There is no exception to this. This is why they've praised and tolerated Hamas & Islamism in the support of killing jews.
Socialists are not capable of holding complicated or nuanced views. They will lie to themselves if need be, but the core of their ideology is dirt simple, and trumps all other considerations. This is because Socialism is a totalizing ideology.
They're not obligated to be caricatures. They are caricatures. Hell, they are caricatures of racists.
With the exception of proven liars and grifters (and particularly heated arguments at times), I prefer to take people at face value about what they claim their beliefs are, rather than tell them what they believe. That doesn't mean they can't be hypocrites, however.
I can't say I have perfect insight into the white nationalist mind but it's fairly obvious they're not as simple as you paint them and I think you're doing yourself a disservice by only allowing yourself to see them as caricatures. The invective gets pretty intense sometimes, maybe you're focusing too much on that?
I'm not perceiving them as caricatures, but idealogues; just as I would any International Socialist. Socialists, universally, only care about acquiring power. They don't even necessarily care about holding it because their obsession and lust for power is nearly deranged. Everyone who is not operating on that activist streak is simply operating from a positions of Useful Idiocy.
The one-track mind that is prepared to sacrifice every principle is not a bug, it is an explicit feature.
Firstly, I don't think there's a requirement in white nationalism to want other races dead. Certainly there are white nationalists who do want that, but I don't think it's a requirement. Surely wanting to empower your own race and have it embedded into the national identity would be the primary requirement, not whatever motives you've ascribed to it.
Anyway, it seems consistent to me that somebody who supports, on principle, a white nationalist identity could also sympathize with the struggle of others to achieve similar ends in their own countries, whether they are white or not. You can want certain kinds of migrants out of your country - or even just curbed in some way - without hating and wishing death upon their race generally. A 'not in my backyard' attitude of a sort.
To add to that, people are capable of holding complicated and nuanced views on complicated and nuanced matters, and that's not even accounting for the varying stages of propganda deprogramming - and information differentials - you'll see even within people who share a movement.
They are not obligated to become the caricature you need them to be.
If White Nationalism were nationalistic, I'd agree. They're not. They're just National Socialists. They are not interested in empowering any race. They are not interested in national identity.
As Socialists, jews are bourgeois race. As such, each jew must be killed, everywhere. There is no exception to this. This is why they've praised and tolerated Hamas & Islamism in the support of killing jews.
Socialists are not capable of holding complicated or nuanced views. They will lie to themselves if need be, but the core of their ideology is dirt simple, and trumps all other considerations. This is because Socialism is a totalizing ideology.
They're not obligated to be caricatures. They are caricatures. Hell, they are caricatures of racists.
With the exception of proven liars and grifters (and particularly heated arguments at times), I prefer to take people at face value about what they claim their beliefs are, rather than tell them what they believe. That doesn't mean they can't be hypocrites, however.
I can't say I have perfect insight into the white nationalist mind but it's fairly obvious they're not as simple as you paint them and I think you're doing yourself a disservice by only allowing yourself to see them as caricatures. The invective gets pretty intense sometimes, maybe you're focusing too much on that?
I'm not perceiving them as caricatures, but idealogues; just as I would any International Socialist. Socialists, universally, only care about acquiring power. They don't even necessarily care about holding it because their obsession and lust for power is nearly deranged. Everyone who is not operating on that activist streak is simply operating from a positions of Useful Idiocy.
The one-track mind that is prepared to sacrifice every principle is not a bug, it is an explicit feature.