But it's not causing the absence. What's causing the absence is the lack of power men have to force women into the role they want. If women were forced not to be sluts they wouldn't take up the helm of trad wife willingly still. They'd just slut around behind everyone's backs. Being a slut is a woman's nature and you can't change her nature. You can only change how much power men have over women to force whatever behaviors you want out of them. If you have unlimited power over women you can in fact make a slut into a wife. You cannot however change her nature so just because you don't see that she wanted to be a slut doesn't mean that's not in her nature.
I have no choice but to continue banging sluts. Wives are liability in our society. For example where I live if I married a woman and had a child with her, she could leave me for any reason she wanted such as because she wanted to be a slut and then take the kids. I would owe her child support, alimony and I might never see my kids while she's getting fucked by another man all because she felt like it. Why would anyone in their right mind get married in such a society? Banging sluts is all I can do. Until the rest of the rules change sluts are beneficial to men.
You're catastrophizing divorce to an absurd degree. My own parents were divorced, and it was nothing like what you are saying. I don't think you actually want to change anything. I think you relish being a degenerate even though you know it's morally wrong.
Absolutely not. I would change things for the better but let's start by changing the things that would objectively benefit men instead of the things that punish men.
For example we could make it legal to hit women if she insults or disobeys a man. Doesn't negatively impact men at all. This is wholly 100% beneficial to men. We could ban women from voting and engaging in politics. We could entirely abolish alimony and child support. We could give men 100% default custody of children in a divorce/separation. We could make it illegal to hire a woman for a job when an equally qualified man has applied to the same job. We could make it against the law to have women in a jury when a man is on trial. We could make women considered as nothing more than assets of men under the law with no human rights by changing rights to only apply to men.
Once society starts moving in a direction to benefit men and we stop women from being able to exploit men then I might consider banning whores and sluts. Until then reducing sluts has no benefit for men. Western society has exceptionally few non-entitled sluts though so it's a moot point. But I've been to societies that have sluts who aren't entitled and it's great. It's a lot of fun. The women are enjoyable. People treat everyone better and it's pretty joyful. Entitled sluts like in western society only sleep with the top men and most of them aren't even sluts, they're almost ALL whores. There's very few sluts in western society. Maybe for 1-2 years when they're 18-19yo they might be sluts but then they typically go hardcore whore mode after.
Are you actually a fucking muslim immigrant? This is the exact kind of bullshit they say when they talk about "sexual emergencies".
You proclaim yourself to be superior. You are demonstrably, by your own admission, a degenerate goon. It is genuinely pathetic when someone tries to claim that something like their race makes them superior, while acting like an absolute fucking disgrace. You're a counter-example - you serve as a demonstration against your race's / culture's inherent or moral superiority. If you claim collective legacy, your actions are a stain on it.
Every time I see one of you conpro fags admit how much of a bunch of hyprocritical leftist faggots you are it makes me loathe your shilling, subversive leftist bullshit even more.
But it's not causing the absence. What's causing the absence is the lack of power men have to force women into the role they want. If women were forced not to be sluts they wouldn't take up the helm of trad wife willingly still. They'd just slut around behind everyone's backs. Being a slut is a woman's nature and you can't change her nature. You can only change how much power men have over women to force whatever behaviors you want out of them. If you have unlimited power over women you can in fact make a slut into a wife. You cannot however change her nature so just because you don't see that she wanted to be a slut doesn't mean that's not in her nature.
It sounds like you want an excuse to continue banging sluts.
I have no choice but to continue banging sluts. Wives are liability in our society. For example where I live if I married a woman and had a child with her, she could leave me for any reason she wanted such as because she wanted to be a slut and then take the kids. I would owe her child support, alimony and I might never see my kids while she's getting fucked by another man all because she felt like it. Why would anyone in their right mind get married in such a society? Banging sluts is all I can do. Until the rest of the rules change sluts are beneficial to men.
You're catastrophizing divorce to an absurd degree. My own parents were divorced, and it was nothing like what you are saying. I don't think you actually want to change anything. I think you relish being a degenerate even though you know it's morally wrong.
Absolutely not. I would change things for the better but let's start by changing the things that would objectively benefit men instead of the things that punish men.
For example we could make it legal to hit women if she insults or disobeys a man. Doesn't negatively impact men at all. This is wholly 100% beneficial to men. We could ban women from voting and engaging in politics. We could entirely abolish alimony and child support. We could give men 100% default custody of children in a divorce/separation. We could make it illegal to hire a woman for a job when an equally qualified man has applied to the same job. We could make it against the law to have women in a jury when a man is on trial. We could make women considered as nothing more than assets of men under the law with no human rights by changing rights to only apply to men.
Once society starts moving in a direction to benefit men and we stop women from being able to exploit men then I might consider banning whores and sluts. Until then reducing sluts has no benefit for men. Western society has exceptionally few non-entitled sluts though so it's a moot point. But I've been to societies that have sluts who aren't entitled and it's great. It's a lot of fun. The women are enjoyable. People treat everyone better and it's pretty joyful. Entitled sluts like in western society only sleep with the top men and most of them aren't even sluts, they're almost ALL whores. There's very few sluts in western society. Maybe for 1-2 years when they're 18-19yo they might be sluts but then they typically go hardcore whore mode after.
Are you actually a fucking muslim immigrant? This is the exact kind of bullshit they say when they talk about "sexual emergencies".
You proclaim yourself to be superior. You are demonstrably, by your own admission, a degenerate goon. It is genuinely pathetic when someone tries to claim that something like their race makes them superior, while acting like an absolute fucking disgrace. You're a counter-example - you serve as a demonstration against your race's / culture's inherent or moral superiority. If you claim collective legacy, your actions are a stain on it.
Every time I see one of you conpro fags admit how much of a bunch of hyprocritical leftist faggots you are it makes me loathe your shilling, subversive leftist bullshit even more.
Glad to know you're an enemy. I'll add you to the list.