This actually happens all the time. When your job as a “scientist” is to reaffirm narratives, all that really matters is that your abstract provides easy quotes for the “science” journos to disseminate to the public. No one is going to sift through your actual data to see if it matches your claims.
Like the abstracts of study "proving transwomen have female brain" and the data proving they actually have overwhelmingly male brains with a few areas ( tied to sexual orientation ) falling between the statistical average of both sexes, not into the female range.
Congrats retard, you proved males who are attracted to males and also larp as "women" have similar brain patterns to males attracted to males who don't larp as women. And you lied about it.
Searching ''trans female brain'' will give plenty of results where the desired conclusion was written in advanced and the researchers worked their way framing results trying to stretch them back it that premade conclusion.
Often conflating those who took years of cross-sex hormones with those who did not ( Of course taking cross sex hormones alters the body. )
With manipulative framing such as ''transwomen brain react like cisgender women's brain'',
What do they mean? They take homosexual males who identify as women, exposed them to male pheromones, and found similar patterns of sexual attraction as straight women.
So they detect homosexuality but pretend this prouves transgenderism is ''their real brain''.
When they test autogynephiles ( men who identify as women and are still attracted to women, or more precisely, aroused by being percieved as a woman ), they don't find this ''female brain'' ( sexual attraction ). Makes sense : it's not the same phenomenon at all.
Instead they find a significant anomaly in one brain area highly associated with paraphilias ( fetishes, zoophilia, pedophilia ).
And go figure, autogynephiles have a totally off-the-chart rate of pedos. Never let a ''transwoman lesbian'' near your children.
So similar manipulations like what Pfizer did with the Coof jab?
Except instead of halting any further trials with pregnant women, the HPV study just blatantly claimed the opposite of what the data demonstrated?
This actually happens all the time. When your job as a “scientist” is to reaffirm narratives, all that really matters is that your abstract provides easy quotes for the “science” journos to disseminate to the public. No one is going to sift through your actual data to see if it matches your claims.
Like the abstracts of study "proving transwomen have female brain" and the data proving they actually have overwhelmingly male brains with a few areas ( tied to sexual orientation ) falling between the statistical average of both sexes, not into the female range.
Congrats retard, you proved males who are attracted to males and also larp as "women" have similar brain patterns to males attracted to males who don't larp as women. And you lied about it.
"tEH soYencE!"
which study was that, I never managed to find the "female brain" study to check it, despite it being the holy grail of progressive science (tm).
Searching ''trans female brain'' will give plenty of results where the desired conclusion was written in advanced and the researchers worked their way framing results trying to stretch them back it that premade conclusion.
Often conflating those who took years of cross-sex hormones with those who did not ( Of course taking cross sex hormones alters the body. )
With manipulative framing such as ''transwomen brain react like cisgender women's brain'',
What do they mean? They take homosexual males who identify as women, exposed them to male pheromones, and found similar patterns of sexual attraction as straight women.
So they detect homosexuality but pretend this prouves transgenderism is ''their real brain''.
When they test autogynephiles ( men who identify as women and are still attracted to women, or more precisely, aroused by being percieved as a woman ), they don't find this ''female brain'' ( sexual attraction ). Makes sense : it's not the same phenomenon at all.
Instead they find a significant anomaly in one brain area highly associated with paraphilias ( fetishes, zoophilia, pedophilia ).
And go figure, autogynephiles have a totally off-the-chart rate of pedos. Never let a ''transwoman lesbian'' near your children.