Yeah, 'cause it's actually a call to genocide. The Left just think that some genocides are okay, and engage in the same level of genocide denialism as any stormfag. This is because stormfags are Leftists.
We have standards of quality here that are higher than most universities at this point, and even a lot of work places, because you can't just go on a racist tirade about white people either.
Plenty of racist tirades at whites, both men and women, go unchecked here as its normal.
You've only recently stopped deleting every mention of nigger or kike bad behavior because the users here are tired of having their hands tied behind their back while debating and have started to call out your censorship.
Call to genocide? How about gizortnik supporting the ethnic cleansing of Palestine? Or is that okay cause the jews are doing it so that comment gets a pass?
You can delete my comment now so you can feel good about keeping your imaginary "stormfag" bot army quiet.
There really aren't ever any racist tirades at whites. I've removed maybe 5 comments that actually met the Rule 16 standards when applied to whites, because nobody here is typically anti-white.
How about gizortnik supporting the ethnic cleansing of Palestine? Or is that okay cause the jews are doing it so that comment gets a pass?
This "code of conduct" is BS anyways. You don't get banned from KiA2 for stuff you said in other forums. There's a fine line between freedom of association and acting as another form of police. It starts with not being satisfied with merely avoiding people you don't like and starting to pressure other people. Policing is just freedom of association scaled up. But I don't care whether it is the government doing it. Anyone who applies pressure in this systematic fashion is really now engaging in anti-speech and anti-freedom-of-association activities.
I don't know that it's avoidable. Someone has to decide who is and isn't allowed to be part of a college. Even forums need moderators. When you setup some kangaroo court to figure it out, though, I'd say you've crossed that line into anti-speech.
Frankly, I'd be better off with the colleges, being government institutions, just allowing damn near everything except the obvious stuff like defamation and incitement. It can create a kind of hostile environment, but if there's ever a place where all ideas need to be able to be voiced, it's government forums, which Universities are supposed to be.
Yeah private and public is very mixed when all of the institutions -- public and private -- are reliant on government funding. Some private schools even have dedicated state or federal revenues from back in the day.
Yeah, 'cause it's actually a call to genocide. The Left just think that some genocides are okay, and engage in the same level of genocide denialism as any stormfag. This is because stormfags are Leftists.
We have standards of quality here that are higher than most universities at this point, and even a lot of work places, because you can't just go on a racist tirade about white people either.
Plenty of racist tirades at whites, both men and women, go unchecked here as its normal.
You've only recently stopped deleting every mention of nigger or kike bad behavior because the users here are tired of having their hands tied behind their back while debating and have started to call out your censorship.
Call to genocide? How about gizortnik supporting the ethnic cleansing of Palestine? Or is that okay cause the jews are doing it so that comment gets a pass?
You can delete my comment now so you can feel good about keeping your imaginary "stormfag" bot army quiet.
There really aren't ever any racist tirades at whites. I've removed maybe 5 comments that actually met the Rule 16 standards when applied to whites, because nobody here is typically anti-white.
Where did he do that?
This "code of conduct" is BS anyways. You don't get banned from KiA2 for stuff you said in other forums. There's a fine line between freedom of association and acting as another form of police. It starts with not being satisfied with merely avoiding people you don't like and starting to pressure other people. Policing is just freedom of association scaled up. But I don't care whether it is the government doing it. Anyone who applies pressure in this systematic fashion is really now engaging in anti-speech and anti-freedom-of-association activities.
I don't know that it's avoidable. Someone has to decide who is and isn't allowed to be part of a college. Even forums need moderators. When you setup some kangaroo court to figure it out, though, I'd say you've crossed that line into anti-speech.
Frankly, I'd be better off with the colleges, being government institutions, just allowing damn near everything except the obvious stuff like defamation and incitement. It can create a kind of hostile environment, but if there's ever a place where all ideas need to be able to be voiced, it's government forums, which Universities are supposed to be.
Yeah private and public is very mixed when all of the institutions -- public and private -- are reliant on government funding. Some private schools even have dedicated state or federal revenues from back in the day.
The universities SHOULD have looser standards anyway. They are government institutions. We are not.