So he says, offering no evidence of his own of 3-4 figure civilian massacres from hamas and refuting none of the evidence indicating Israel opened fire on its own people, undermining the whole narrative.
Since you're enthusiastic about evidence here's more:
'I'm on the phone with a family that is in the MMD, there are terrorists inside their house, they are locked inside the MMD. Our forces haven't had time to reach this settlement yet, and I've already run out of missiles there.' , which is the more accurate weaponry. I decide to shoot a cannon 30 meters from this house, a very difficult decision. I shoot so that if they are now there, they will hear the explosions inside the house, that they will realize that they know they are there, and hopefully they will get out of this house.'
Yasmin Porat, a survivor of the bloodshed at Kibbutz Be’eri, near the boundary with Gaza, says many Israeli civilians were killed by Israeli forces.
An Israeli woman who survived the Hamas assault on settlements near the Gaza boundary on 7 October says Israeli civilians were “undoubtedly” killed by their own security forces.
It happened when Israeli forces engaged in fierce gun battles with Palestinian fighters in Kibbutz Be’eri and fired indiscriminately at both the fighters and their Israeli prisoners.
“They eliminated everyone, including the hostages,” she told Israeli radio. “There was very, very heavy crossfire” and even tank shelling.
The proclivity to shoot their own has even been enshrined in policy
as per the Hannibal Protocol
The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל) (or "Procedure" or "Protocol") is a controversial procedure used by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. The directive was revoked in 2016, to be replaced by a new directive of unknown content.
The directive has been changed several times. At one time, the formulation was that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."
You subject the IDF's story to less scrutiny and accountability than even direct survivors of your precious atrocity do. Of the two of us you're clearly the more likely to respond to orders from across the internet, so be a good golem and keep yours to yourself.
I can't believe you took the time to post that Kenosha vid. Not a single one of the cars in that footage is totally crushed and flattened like the ones clearly torn to bits by heavy arms fire in Israel. Not one. By all means screen cap one that's equally damaged to the same extent as any of the burnt cars in my linked vid.
You deliberately ignore the examples of random shredded unburnt cars hit by autocannons too, because now you've resorted to naked dishonesty. Whether that's because of your embarrassment or vested interest is up to you, it's of no interest to me.
So he says, offering no evidence of his own of 3-4 figure civilian massacres from hamas and refuting none of the evidence indicating Israel opened fire on its own people, undermining the whole narrative.
Since you're enthusiastic about evidence here's more:
Also
The proclivity to shoot their own has even been enshrined in policy as per the Hannibal Protocol
You subject the IDF's story to less scrutiny and accountability than even direct survivors of your precious atrocity do. Of the two of us you're clearly the more likely to respond to orders from across the internet, so be a good golem and keep yours to yourself.
You have nothing to refute with. You aren't aware of Hamas's own work, and you don't know what a burned car looks like. Sit down.
I can't believe you took the time to post that Kenosha vid. Not a single one of the cars in that footage is totally crushed and flattened like the ones clearly torn to bits by heavy arms fire in Israel. Not one. By all means screen cap one that's equally damaged to the same extent as any of the burnt cars in my linked vid.
You deliberately ignore the examples of random shredded unburnt cars hit by autocannons too, because now you've resorted to naked dishonesty. Whether that's because of your embarrassment or vested interest is up to you, it's of no interest to me.
You are too ignorant for your criticism to matter. You can literally see the damaged cars wrecked and twisted in the fires.
You are either willfully ignorant, or speaking purely in bad faith.