Daily Wire seems salty for some reason - Kotaku In Action 2

Daily Wire seems salty for some reason (media.kotakuinaction2.win)

posted 364 days ago by evilplushie 364 days ago by evilplushie +88 / -0

59 comments download

59 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (59)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points 363 days ago +6 / -1

If crowder got canceled and he lost 30% of his audience DW would be making less money. Why would Crowder also then not make less money?

Because Daily Wire can absorb the hit and should stand by their talent. Also, the long term impact of cancellation is often much less painful than the short term.

DW employs many people so they can't make dumb business decisions and put the livelihood of their employees and their families at risk. If DW wrote up a contract that would say if Crowder makes us no money we will still pay him 60 million dollars, they would be idiots.

Oh please lol. As I said, just offer him less money commensurate with the calculated risk.

There's no telling how much booster money has poured into the DW either.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -2 ▼

– Melvar52 -2 points 363 days ago +1 / -3

Crowder said 60 million was too low. You're an idiot if you think DW should make contracts that would open them up to losing money on their shows. DW does stand by their talent, they don't fire them and still pay them what they are able to. Other companies that don't stand by their talent fire them due to the pressure of the woke mob.

If you were writing contacts for your own business would you write in the contract if an employee is no longer able to make you money that you would still pay them? DW is a business, not a charity.

And again, Crowder could have negotiated but he refused to.

There is clearly no getting through to you.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– The_Shadow_of_Intent 3 points 363 days ago +3 / -0

Crowder said 60 million was too low.

Idk, maybe it is with the audience numbers he's reaching - who knows?

You're an idiot if you think DW should make contracts that would open them up to losing money on their shows. DW does stand by their talent, they don't fire them and still pay them what they are able to. Other companies that don't stand by their talent fire them due to the pressure of the woke mob.

Losing profit and going in the red are two totally different things, and it's not clear to me which situation would happen if Crowder got booted off Youtube. Let me break out the clap hands emojis for the rest of your post:

OFFER clap LESS clap MONEY clap TO clap OFFSET clap RISK.

CROWDER clap IS clap ALSO clap RETARDED clap

permalink parent save report block reply