Crowder said 60 million was too low. You're an idiot if you think DW should make contracts that would open them up to losing money on their shows. DW does stand by their talent, they don't fire them and still pay them what they are able to. Other companies that don't stand by their talent fire them due to the pressure of the woke mob.
If you were writing contacts for your own business would you write in the contract if an employee is no longer able to make you money that you would still pay them? DW is a business, not a charity.
And again, Crowder could have negotiated but he refused to.
There is clearly no getting through to you.
If crowder got canceled and he lost 30% of his audience DW would be making less money. Why would Crowder also then not make less money? It has nothing to do with the veracity of the claims by YT which we all know they are partisan hacks. DW employs many people so they can't make dumb business decisions and put the livelihood of their employees and their families at risk. If DW wrote up a contract that would say if Crowder makes us no money we will still pay him 60 million dollars, they would be idiots.
If Crowder didn't like that part of the term sheet he could have just negotiated, but he didn't. He decided to record his friend and burn all his bridges with DW and try to pit conservatives against each other for his own benefit.
The thing is DW already has content on YouTube that they themselves censor because it still gets them money and can get part of their message out. They then plug their content that is behind the paywall that is uncensored. Michael Knowles littlerally bleeps every time he says trans when they put their content on YouTube. DW got this idea from Crowder that wouldn't say stuff that would get him kicked off YouTube but then he would say at the end of every show if you want to hear our uncensored content come to mug club and YouTube you can piss off.
They are doing the exact same thing, but somehow DW is the bad guy?
A bit of a prick? It's probably much more than that. It isn't just Landau it is also not gay Jared and quarter black Garret. Everyone that has sat in the #2/3 chair besides Gerald has left and either isn't allowed to talk about the show, super sketchy, or has talked poorly of Crowder. Then also Sven left and hasn't been allowed to talk about the show.
I can't think of a single person that has left DW and or had bad things to say about the company. If your are aware of someone let me know.
I'm so confused why crowder and his fans (I used to be one) keep talking about how that terms sheet (not even a contract) was bad because it said if daily wire lost revenue then Crowder would also lose revenue. If he gets kicked off of platforms and can't get as revenue from them DW loses money. Why would crowder still receive the same amount of money then? If crowder didn't like the terms sheet he could have negotiated, but instead he just threw a fit. Boering even said it was just hastily put together as something generic and was the first stepping stone for negotiations. If crowder wanted he should have just negotiated a smaller flat rate regardless of cancelations and demonitizations, but then get a % of profit sharing so when he does better he gets more money. Instead crowder decided to record his friend and release it to everyone to try and make himself look like the only real conservative.
If a friend made a contract like that for you wouldn't you just question them about it and show them what you're talking about instead of instantly reacting and burning bridges? What ever happened to giving people the benefit of a doubt? Hell someone could have meant to not have a 0 or a decimal point somewhere. Communication is key for everything.