Israel has been actively attacking Iran. I don't know why they would stop a particular operation.
An actually overt airstrike.
Here is what ole' Joel has been up to:
Well, he does say 'temporary', but that is either naive or malevolent. There's nothing more permanent than 'temporary' immigration.
We've discussed Israel's propping up of Hamas many times. Stop feigning ignorance.
No, I think you're wrong. And you miss important context. It appears that the widely shared Bibi quote about supporting Hamas is just about allowing Qatari money to come in, and it's not substantiated either.
A lot more Gazans would be dying without it.
Why is that the problem of the EU? Maybe if things were allowed to play out, it would actually end rather than festering.
The West is propping up Israel and paying the bill for the humanitarian crisis it creates.
Not the EU, they just love their terrorist friends.
That's all of them. They just don't have the ties to Israel's bad optics, lunatic fringe like Hungary does.
May I ask why you think that Europe's only decent government with the fall of Poland is the bad guy in your view?
You will still end up having to oppose Zionism, but it wouldn't be as glaringly obvious. Zionists continuously drag us into an interventionalist foreign policy.
I don't think you've ever linked this for me, so what's up with the aggression?
Although careful in public, in early 2019 Mr Netanyahu was quoted as saying behind closed doors that those who opposed a two-state solution should support the transfer of funds to Gaza, because it worked against Palestinian unity, according to the Times of Israel.
This uncited quote is exactly what I referenced earlier.
You didn't link it in that thread, you just posted that quote. Good for you if you linked to it in the past, but you posted just that quote in that thread.
I don't think it said that Israel knowingly let funds get to Hamas, but I wouldn't be surprised if that were true. Obviously, divide and conquer is a thing, and sometimes it backfires.
I recall that last time you brought it up, I linked you the WSJ article with the full context - which wasn't even close to the way you had been presenting that quote.
An actually overt airstrike.
Well, he does say 'temporary', but that is either naive or malevolent. There's nothing more permanent than 'temporary' immigration.
No, I think you're wrong. And you miss important context. It appears that the widely shared Bibi quote about supporting Hamas is just about allowing Qatari money to come in, and it's not substantiated either.
Why is that the problem of the EU? Maybe if things were allowed to play out, it would actually end rather than festering.
Not the EU, they just love their terrorist friends.
May I ask why you think that Europe's only decent government with the fall of Poland is the bad guy in your view?
How?
There is also an Avner Cohen quote I've shard with you multiple time. Stop playing games faggot.
And I provided you with the full article, which you unfortunately ignored because it did not fit your preconceptions.
I linked you multiple articles on it. All you did is make excuses for it. Now you are denying it ever happened.
I don't think you've ever linked this for me, so what's up with the aggression?
This uncited quote is exactly what I referenced earlier.
You didn't link it in that thread, you just posted that quote. Good for you if you linked to it in the past, but you posted just that quote in that thread.
I don't think it said that Israel knowingly let funds get to Hamas, but I wouldn't be surprised if that were true. Obviously, divide and conquer is a thing, and sometimes it backfires.
Not sure why you think it is your silver bullet.
I recall that last time you brought it up, I linked you the WSJ article with the full context - which wasn't even close to the way you had been presenting that quote.