Judge orders a new primary election after evidence was presented of widespread, pernicious fraud.
Original Link: https://ctexaminer.com/2023/11/01/court-overturns-ganim-win-in-bridgeport-primary-calling-evidence-of-fraud-shocking/
Archive Link: https://archive.ph/5oqQX
BRIDGEPORT – A judge ruled on Wednesday to overturn the city’s Democratic primary election, initially won by incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, following claims of absentee ballot fraud by his opponent, John Gomes.
After two weeks of evidentiary hearings for Gomes’s absentee ballot fraud lawsuit, Judge William Clark ordered a new Democratic primary based on 180 pieces of evidence presented by Gomes’s legal counsel.
In the 37-page ruling, Clark said the video footage presented by Bill Bloss – Gomes’s attorney – was particularly alarming.
"Mr. Ganim was also correct to be ‘shocked’ at what he saw on the video clips in evidence that were shown to him while he was on the witness stand,” Clark wrote. “The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.
I am confused, I have been told over and over again, for over a decade now, that election fraud rarely happens? But yet, here we see yet another local election overturned due to widespread, pernicious fraud. This happens over and over again, all across the country, but we are supposed to believe that this never happens at the state level? /sarc
File these links away, people. Throw them in the face of anyone who says election fraud never happens.
Well... ok but it only happens in isolated incidents in local elections with the city.
It's often the same people running the national elections, but TOTALLY DIFFERENT this time
As the judge in Kari Lake's case explained, the claimants need to PROVE someone would have motive to commit fraud in an election. It's not like it's self-evident or anything...
No motive at all, other than taking control of the levers of power. Once they have it, oops, no standing!