Okay, fair enough. Hopefully our little exchange here has helped you in some way - my point is simply this, that a just and moral society does not arise naturally from a "homogenise society", but rather requires all the majority to buy into that society and act accordingly based on their own free will. That's easier said than done, but it's be done before, and it will be done again. We already know how.
It is much easier though with a homogenous society because the moral values people wish to follow are easier to follow if those values are in alignment with their nature.
Imagine you wanted to create a moral value system that said sucking air was evil and blowing air was good but you were composed of a group of vacuum cleaners. Yes, you could potentially create said society because of the power you have to force such a moral value system on others but it would be much harder for your group of vacuum cleaners to accept said society and they would resist it more while trying to subvert it and change it because their nature compels them to suck air not blow it. If you had a group of snow blowers on the other hand, it would be far easier to enforce this moral value system on the people and the people would be less likely to subvert the moral values and try to change them because these moral values align with their nature.
That is the point I'm making. If you want a moral society then it is much easier to do so in a homogenous society so long as the morals are also in alignment with the nature of the people within your homogenous society.
In the end, a truly homogeneous society would be one where people have the same moral values. This does not arise naturally from race or genetics, but from individuals choosing of their own free will to follow those values, ultimately from teaching people a true morality that they can see and accept as Truth themselves.
Not only that, but a society will not be moral based on rules alone, instead the people must collectively use their minds to determine what is right and wrong based on God's teaching. Otherwise the rules become pointless human rules, much like what was happening in the time of Christ.
Similarly, a top down imposition of rigid rules does not work, because unless the majority in your society chooses of their own free will to be moral, they will find ways around the rules, exploit the rules for their own benefit, or make up their own human rules for material gain.
God's hand does not work through genetics or power alone, but through a mechanism. A mechanism that ensures that societies that manage to arrange themselves according to His plan will prosper and outcompete those who do not.
The Jews in Christ's time were expecting a Messiah who would be an invincible warrior and bring their society, based on a common genetic line, to glory. But Jesus was not such a Messiah. He was powerful yet He did not use His power to rule. He used it to teach. He used it to give the blueprint to His followers to build societies that would prosper. He also opened up the Kingdom of God to all who would follow Him, not just the Jews who descended from their genetic line.The reason He did this was that it was the only way for God's plan to come to fruition, with us men building it ourselves, choosing to do so in our own individual ways, to bring about a whole that works in a just way.
And as we know, those teachings came to rule the world (and still do, in many ways, despite recent setbacks), just as God's mechanism would have it. That, perhaps, is a true manifestation of power.
Okay, fair enough. Hopefully our little exchange here has helped you in some way - my point is simply this, that a just and moral society does not arise naturally from a "homogenise society", but rather requires all the majority to buy into that society and act accordingly based on their own free will. That's easier said than done, but it's be done before, and it will be done again. We already know how.
It is much easier though with a homogenous society because the moral values people wish to follow are easier to follow if those values are in alignment with their nature.
Imagine you wanted to create a moral value system that said sucking air was evil and blowing air was good but you were composed of a group of vacuum cleaners. Yes, you could potentially create said society because of the power you have to force such a moral value system on others but it would be much harder for your group of vacuum cleaners to accept said society and they would resist it more while trying to subvert it and change it because their nature compels them to suck air not blow it. If you had a group of snow blowers on the other hand, it would be far easier to enforce this moral value system on the people and the people would be less likely to subvert the moral values and try to change them because these moral values align with their nature.
That is the point I'm making. If you want a moral society then it is much easier to do so in a homogenous society so long as the morals are also in alignment with the nature of the people within your homogenous society.
In the end, a truly homogeneous society would be one where people have the same moral values. This does not arise naturally from race or genetics, but from individuals choosing of their own free will to follow those values, ultimately from teaching people a true morality that they can see and accept as Truth themselves.
Not only that, but a society will not be moral based on rules alone, instead the people must collectively use their minds to determine what is right and wrong based on God's teaching. Otherwise the rules become pointless human rules, much like what was happening in the time of Christ.
Similarly, a top down imposition of rigid rules does not work, because unless the majority in your society chooses of their own free will to be moral, they will find ways around the rules, exploit the rules for their own benefit, or make up their own human rules for material gain.
I think you underestimate genetics and you underestimate power.
God's hand does not work through genetics or power alone, but through a mechanism. A mechanism that ensures that societies that manage to arrange themselves according to His plan will prosper and outcompete those who do not.
The Jews in Christ's time were expecting a Messiah who would be an invincible warrior and bring their society, based on a common genetic line, to glory. But Jesus was not such a Messiah. He was powerful yet He did not use His power to rule. He used it to teach. He used it to give the blueprint to His followers to build societies that would prosper. He also opened up the Kingdom of God to all who would follow Him, not just the Jews who descended from their genetic line.The reason He did this was that it was the only way for God's plan to come to fruition, with us men building it ourselves, choosing to do so in our own individual ways, to bring about a whole that works in a just way.
And as we know, those teachings came to rule the world (and still do, in many ways, despite recent setbacks), just as God's mechanism would have it. That, perhaps, is a true manifestation of power.