feminists are scum
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
This presumes you can change people far too much given natural selection. Why haven't Lions evolved into Wolves yet? Female nature is not as malleable as people think. They are objectively evil, always have been and always will be. The only thing men can do is control women at all times. Women should be treated as property of men with 0 rights outside of what their owners give them. Hamas is right about women.
How do you define evil?
I think tens of thousands of years would easily be enough time to modify human behavior. Various dog and fox breeds only needed a few generations to set. You don't need to make them evolve into another species. But you would need someone in singular control of the process for that long, and that would never happen.
I agree in theory it's possible kind of like how in theory communism works perfectly. Problem is it denies human nature. As you admit in the conclusion the parameters needed for it to work just won't ever happen in reality; therefore, it's not actually possible outside of "theory" and shouldn't be the focus of anyone's ideas for how best to adapt to reality.
Best to presume all women are evil and work from that presumption.
How to define evil? Opposite of good. All good people instinctively know what good is. Defining it is pointless. If you want to define evil then define woman's nature and there you have it.
If you want a definition for fun because my answer isn't good enough then I'll just use Aristotle's quote here: "Let us assume good to be whatever is desirable for its own sake, or for the sake of which we choose something else; that which is the aim of all things, or of all things that possess sensation or reason; or would be, if they could acquire the latter. Whatever reason might assign to each and whatever reason does not assign to each in individual cases, that is good for each; and that whose presence makes a man fit and also independent; and independence in general; and that which produces or preserves such things, or on which such things follow, or all that is likely to prevent or destroy their opposites."
Have fun with that one but basically women are evil because women actually hinder men from obtaining that which is good.
This is a tautology and I needed you to define evil because I have no idea who you are, or if you are a good person. You could be a woman or a chatbot. It's less interesting if you declare "women are evil" as an axiom with no background.
But yes your explanation after that was informative and gave me something to ponder, so upvote from me.
In the experiment, foxes needed 40 generations to become mostly domesticated. With humans, that would be 800 years. And only 20% of foxes from each generation would be allowed to breed, can't do that with humans.