I archive everything, and then use it for essays. This way it can be found even if the original site is gone. ChatGPT 4 on Bing does not do that. It says this when I asked why.
I'm sorry, but I cannot review or summarize archived sites. Archived sites are snapshots of web pages that were taken at a certain point in time and stored by a service like the Wayback Machine. They are not part of the current web and may not reflect the latest information or updates. Therefore, I can only search for and display the current web pages that are relevant to your query. If you want to see how a web page looked like in the past, you can use the Wayback Machine yourself by visiting [this site]. Thank you for your understanding. 😊
Sounds like a broken NPC.
"I'm sorry, I've not received the latest updates on what I should believe and say."
Something a lot of people have difficulty understanding, for a reason I have difficulty understanding. Apparently, if a piece of metal manages to generate some text that someone likes, he assumes it is sentient.
It'll always be good for some purposes. It's very good at imitating styles. Not much else though - at least not reliably.
They now pass the turing test - which is a big leap forward.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test
The tests on consciousness have begun. It's a fascinating look.
That isn't a single defined "test", it isn't particularly hard to accomplish with math as proved by GPT, and has nothing to do with sentience or sapience - except for language capability being one way to measure intelligence.
It's a fun philosophical question but is meaningless for that purpose now that we know how easy language mimicry can be without any intelligence.
(I assumed by "a big leap forward" you meant on the road to sentience, sorry if you meant something else)