Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

31
Here is a detailed post about how the South Korean Lolisho ban, posted for reference. (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 2 years ago by AbleistSL 2 years ago by AbleistSL +31 / -0
101 comments download share
101 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (101)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– acp_k2win 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

So we should stop acting on good intentions because sometimes it turns out badly? What else can we use to determine our actions OTHER than our intentions?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– redman012 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Not my counterpoint, but what I believe could be his counterpoint: The United States from July 4th, 1776 to the surrender of Japan in WW2, or if you discount that, July 4th, 1776 to the election of Woodrow Wilson.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– acp_k2win 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I would say British colonies from around 1650 to around 1750 but yeah similar idea.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– acp_k2win 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You failed to answer the question about where your idea of "much further" is a bad thing.

You say "dont ban cartoon child porn" and your reason is "something else will be banned later". But you never say what that is.

I use the same slippery slope reasoning in saying we ban cartoon child porn because normalizing that will lead to to the acceptance of real child porn. But also because cartoon child porn is bad in itself.

Why is your reasoning correct and mine not?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy