You failed to answer the question about where your idea of "much further" is a bad thing.

You say "dont ban cartoon child porn" and your reason is "something else will be banned later". But you never say what that is.

I use the same slippery slope reasoning in saying we ban cartoon child porn because normalizing that will lead to to the acceptance of real child porn. But also because cartoon child porn is bad in itself.

Why is your reasoning correct and mine not?