Circumcision achieves nothing that abstinence, condoms and regularly washing your genitalia with soap does not.
Comparing people who oppose mutilating the genitals of defenseless infants to a pedophile like John Money is not just irresponsible: it is ludicrous and fundamentally dishonest. You are not arguing in good faith.
Circumcision achieves nothing that abstinence, condoms and regularly washing your genitalia with soap does not.
That would be incorrect, you still run a far higher chance of penile cancer and worse health outcomes even if you were to be celibate your entire life.
Comparing people who oppose mutilating the genitals of defenseless infants to a pedophile like John Money is not just irresponsible: it is ludicrous and fundamentally dishonest. You are not arguing in good faith.
I’m sorry, the same people claiming trauma from circumcision using John moneys studies? It’s funny how you keep talking in circles while still not acknowledging that the “trauma” studies were hilariously fraudulent and pushed by the same collective of “scientists”.
Circumcision achieves nothing that abstinence, condoms and regularly washing your genitalia with soap does not.
Comparing people who oppose mutilating the genitals of defenseless infants to a pedophile like John Money is not just irresponsible: it is ludicrous and fundamentally dishonest. You are not arguing in good faith.
That would be incorrect, you still run a far higher chance of penile cancer and worse health outcomes even if you were to be celibate your entire life.
I’m sorry, the same people claiming trauma from circumcision using John moneys studies? It’s funny how you keep talking in circles while still not acknowledging that the “trauma” studies were hilariously fraudulent and pushed by the same collective of “scientists”.