They don't let them become a majority, and it's not so much as voters but in the positions of power. There are also anti-integration policies like these. Why are you asking? You commented in that thread so you are definitely aware of it.
More or less, yeah. I would have various checks on institutions as well so that hostile minorities can't obtain power over us. Basically, I want to balance moderation with what white people need. If that 30% of non-whites is extremely violent toward us, we need more drastic measures to keep them away, but the default isn't going to be some sort of "load them into boxcares" insanity.
Even if I were bullshitting you and secretly was the genocidal maniac you think I am, a movement like that isn't going to get anywhere. Contrary to normie takes on things like the NSDAP, they don't just arise because their propaganda was just that damn good. It takes extreme conditions for that sort of stuff to assume power.
More or less, yeah. I would have various checks on institutions as well so that hostile minorities can't obtain power over us.
What are you thinking of, or is it theoretical in that it would need to be worked out? And I'm honestly curious, not looking for a gotcha to say "AHA, SEE YOU ARE A BAD GUY".
Basically, I want to balance moderation with what white people need. If that 30% of non-whites is extremely violent toward us, we need more drastic measures to keep them away, but the default isn't going to be some sort of "load them into boxcares" insanity.
So really the Israel model. Very interesting, because most 'white nationalist' types cite Israel as an 'ethnostate' and ask why they're not allowed to advocate for one, while in reality advocating for things that go much further than what Israel does.
Even if I were bullshitting you and secretly was the genocidal maniac you think I am,
I don't think that at all, you hardly sound like one. The only thing that is foreign to me is the concern for color/race, but based on (ius sanguinis) nationality I find it reasonable.
Contrary to normie takes on things like the NSDAP, they don't just arise because their propaganda was just that damn good. It takes extreme conditions for that sort of stuff to assume power.
More importantly, they were running on the bad economy and opposing communism, not on "gas the Jews" - which wasn't even on their agenda to begin with. Just like communists in 1917 seized power (or in one evocative phrase, picked up sovereignty from the ground) and kept it under the slogan of land and peace, not "we'll start a civil war killing millions and then starve tens of millions while reducing the country to backwardness and penury".
As you say, "normies" have no idea what happened and why.
Essentially, stuff like limiting who owns media and can run for office, perhaps by who they are representing. The only way I can see things working out as if various ethnic blocks end up organized as a sort of confederacy, even if they don't occupy contiguous regions (which they probably won't).
I don't think that at all, you hardly sound like one.
DominatedByMenAnally seems to disagree with you.
in reality advocating for things that go much further than what Israel does.
It's funny you are saying that because I was banned from here for posting from the NJP's website, and they only advocate a quota on Jews at 2% That wasn't even the subject of the article. It's almost as if being banned from everything and then having our views described by our enemies leads to some misconceptions.
Commies had a real shot at taking over Germany though, and that too, was a product of the times. The bottom line is, I just don't see White Americans tolerating a Holobunga unless it looks like a real "us or them" scenario. If you don't think it's going to get that bad, there's little to worry about.
They don't let them become a majority, and it's not so much as voters but in the positions of power. There are also anti-integration policies like these. Why are you asking? You commented in that thread so you are definitely aware of it.
I'd like a law like that in Europe.
But is that as far as you want to go? It's all very moderate.
More or less, yeah. I would have various checks on institutions as well so that hostile minorities can't obtain power over us. Basically, I want to balance moderation with what white people need. If that 30% of non-whites is extremely violent toward us, we need more drastic measures to keep them away, but the default isn't going to be some sort of "load them into boxcares" insanity.
Even if I were bullshitting you and secretly was the genocidal maniac you think I am, a movement like that isn't going to get anywhere. Contrary to normie takes on things like the NSDAP, they don't just arise because their propaganda was just that damn good. It takes extreme conditions for that sort of stuff to assume power.
What are you thinking of, or is it theoretical in that it would need to be worked out? And I'm honestly curious, not looking for a gotcha to say "AHA, SEE YOU ARE A BAD GUY".
So really the Israel model. Very interesting, because most 'white nationalist' types cite Israel as an 'ethnostate' and ask why they're not allowed to advocate for one, while in reality advocating for things that go much further than what Israel does.
I don't think that at all, you hardly sound like one. The only thing that is foreign to me is the concern for color/race, but based on (ius sanguinis) nationality I find it reasonable.
More importantly, they were running on the bad economy and opposing communism, not on "gas the Jews" - which wasn't even on their agenda to begin with. Just like communists in 1917 seized power (or in one evocative phrase, picked up sovereignty from the ground) and kept it under the slogan of land and peace, not "we'll start a civil war killing millions and then starve tens of millions while reducing the country to backwardness and penury".
As you say, "normies" have no idea what happened and why.
Essentially, stuff like limiting who owns media and can run for office, perhaps by who they are representing. The only way I can see things working out as if various ethnic blocks end up organized as a sort of confederacy, even if they don't occupy contiguous regions (which they probably won't).
DominatedByMenAnally seems to disagree with you.
It's funny you are saying that because I was banned from here for posting from the NJP's website, and they only advocate a quota on Jews at 2% That wasn't even the subject of the article. It's almost as if being banned from everything and then having our views described by our enemies leads to some misconceptions.
Commies had a real shot at taking over Germany though, and that too, was a product of the times. The bottom line is, I just don't see White Americans tolerating a Holobunga unless it looks like a real "us or them" scenario. If you don't think it's going to get that bad, there's little to worry about.