I would have respect for them too, I'd just respectfully ask them to improve the UI, discoverability on that platform without ALREADY knowing the creator (like from YouTube) is awful on there.
For now, Rumble will remain far more niche - it does not have the resources to be competitive with Youtube even in terms of UI, etc. But it will keep improving as it grows.
Considering every new YouTube UI enhancement has been user hostile for a while (downvotes, search, order by age, playlists), the lack of "enhancement" for Rumble can only be seen as a good thing.
Like I said in the other thread, Rumble has no raison d'etre if they censor just as much as YouTube. I think in this particular case, the right thing to do is aligned with their monetary interest.
I can't remember if this is true of Rumble, but some of the alternatives' clients still lack the usability and features of YouTube. That's ok as long as there's some reason to be on Rumble.
I would have respect for them too, I'd just respectfully ask them to improve the UI, discoverability on that platform without ALREADY knowing the creator (like from YouTube) is awful on there.
For now, Rumble will remain far more niche - it does not have the resources to be competitive with Youtube even in terms of UI, etc. But it will keep improving as it grows.
Considering every new YouTube UI enhancement has been user hostile for a while (downvotes, search, order by age, playlists), the lack of "enhancement" for Rumble can only be seen as a good thing.
Like I said in the other thread, Rumble has no raison d'etre if they censor just as much as YouTube. I think in this particular case, the right thing to do is aligned with their monetary interest.
I can't remember if this is true of Rumble, but some of the alternatives' clients still lack the usability and features of YouTube. That's ok as long as there's some reason to be on Rumble.