Given the mountain of undeniable evidence that appears to be necessary to indict a Democrat vs. the novel legal theories and "sources familiar with the matter" allowed to indict Trump allies ... I don't really blame people for their "hypocrisy".
Possible. Or maybe he offended the regime in some way. I have no particular affinity for Menendez, but I did notice that his first indictment was thrown out and that it was brought by none other than our great friend Jack Smith.
RFK is also a Democrat. I don't think it'll require a mountain of evidence to indict him.
EDIT: I'm not arguing that this is the case, or that it's even likely. Menendez is a neocon after all, though he did back Armenia against Azerbaijan. Only saying that I don't trust the regime even when it's "bearing gifts".
Time for people on both sides to switch their position on "innocent until proven guilty" and "an indictment is not proof of guilt".
Given the mountain of undeniable evidence that appears to be necessary to indict a Democrat vs. the novel legal theories and "sources familiar with the matter" allowed to indict Trump allies ... I don't really blame people for their "hypocrisy".
Possible. Or maybe he offended the regime in some way. I have no particular affinity for Menendez, but I did notice that his first indictment was thrown out and that it was brought by none other than our great friend Jack Smith.
RFK is also a Democrat. I don't think it'll require a mountain of evidence to indict him.
EDIT: I'm not arguing that this is the case, or that it's even likely. Menendez is a neocon after all, though he did back Armenia against Azerbaijan. Only saying that I don't trust the regime even when it's "bearing gifts".
In RFK's case, they already tried to shoot him.
I'm not sure that was the regime. It'd look rather bad for them if yet another Kennedy was assassinated in suspicious circumstances.