If a teacher thinks there is a realistic possibility of abuse, they are required by law to report it to police/child protective services.
They are not trained to handle these situations, as the law fully acknowledges. If they overstep that line, they're liable.
Not believing in "gender theory", something that has absolutely no basis in any science whatsoever, should be a right.
Excellent point. I'd go further, in fact, and declare that "gender theory" is a political movement originating in academia, and not an academic discipline, meaning they don't have the right to teach it in schools at all.
they don't have the right to teach it in schools at all
Sadly they still do legally, which shows how logically vacuous and nonsensical the decisions were to remove prayer in schools and subsequently to remove faith from all public proceedings. Even if someone believes the founders wanted separation of church and state, you think they wanted to ban longstanding cultural religious traditions from public life, but weird new cults and foreign creeds would be OK?
This has been soundly debunked by many people.
If a teacher thinks there is a realistic possibility of abuse, they are required by law to report it to police/child protective services.
They are not trained to handle these situations, as the law fully acknowledges. If they overstep that line, they're liable.
Excellent point. I'd go further, in fact, and declare that "gender theory" is a political movement originating in academia, and not an academic discipline, meaning they don't have the right to teach it in schools at all.
Sadly they still do legally, which shows how logically vacuous and nonsensical the decisions were to remove prayer in schools and subsequently to remove faith from all public proceedings. Even if someone believes the founders wanted separation of church and state, you think they wanted to ban longstanding cultural religious traditions from public life, but weird new cults and foreign creeds would be OK?