Imp fails to understand that there are movements that hate anything good; they will tell a boy to cut his dick off and a girl to chop her tits off. Imp assumes anything bad is female, rather than demonic, in nature.
Yes, Solanas. A walking demonic figure. I get it Imp, but her ideas are traceable. Her>Foucault (with his female groomers) >Sarte (and his female groomer) >Marx > etc; most had a penis.
To be honest, because I appreciate the role of women in society, and understand that it can go either way. You clearly understand that the role and impact of women is important but assume they're pure "bad." I think women must be guided in their ideas and behavior but are potentially good and ultimately essential to any society. Truth be told my ideas may be more "misogynistic" than yours.
A TERF is shilling that the main victims of transgenderism are women, who not only are old enough to know better, but are also able to reverse their surgery in a way that males cannot.
Basically, Nazis doing Nazi things. You don't count as victims, because you aren't human to start with.
Hey Imp, I'm pretty sure that the #LetWomenSpeak group are solely focused on adult human females and are expanding into younger human females at this stage in their growth.
They'll hopefully coordinate with groups who can assist other specific communities of need and share best practice with them as they evolve.
Them helping young women isn't them forgetting about young men. Some help is better than no help.
Them helping young women isn't them forgetting about young men. Some help is better than no help.
Elsewhere you claim that these feminists now realize the damage they've done to boys and are starting to regret it. Yet, this logic makes little sense - if their main victims are boys, why start by helping girls? It is far more likely that they still don't really care about boys, yes, even their sons, because years and years of absorbing hateful propaganda about "men being trash" will do that to you. So, I'm not buying this at all. These women are still feminists. And feminists still only care about women and girls, and don't give a shit about men or boys apart from paying lip-service or using manipulative tactics that ultimately benefit women and girls at the expense of men and boys.
I'll grant you that this situation is indeed a direct consequence of earlier decisions made by militant feminists rubbing some men's faces in what they perceived as victories.
They suck and should be ashamed of what they've done.
The current situation though is that plenty have sat and allowed this to happen and are now taking action, be it baby steps or soft approaches, to try to remedy this situation.
You are right that once they've achieved their goal they will forget about hanging around to help any further, but it's documenting that entire process and using it for evidence that it exists which gives as all a place to argue from.
You don't have to look far to see all of these opinionated militant feminists shitting themselves because they ended up with sons, which they love, and realise that their futures are fucked because of what their mothers took part in.
It's not all carnage, well not all the way down anyway, but hopefully we can all get through this and leave it better than we found it.
It's much darker than that. As the link I posted to the other user shows, radical feminism is directly responsible for pushing this on kids, it was one of their goals.
Shame isn't enough. Nuremberg is enough. Real, lasting consequences and complete destruction of feminism. That's all I'm willing to accept.
You don't have to look far to see all of these opinionated militant feminists shitting themselves because they ended up with sons, which they love, and realise that their futures are fucked because of what their mothers took part in.
I literally have never seen this. I've seen them talking about aborting a baby if it's a boy, but never this. I think you're talking about women in general, which maybe can be argued, but open feminists are unforgivable scum who should be thrown out of society.
Maybe after that we can attempt to rebuild gender relations, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Real, lasting consequences and complete destruction of feminism. That's all I'm willing to accept.
That's unattainable Imp, but hold onto it if you think that the compromise can be pulled further in that direction if you want. The other side already hold onto their grip on that tug-of-war rope in that sense.
Maybe after that we can attempt to rebuild gender relations, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Something has to give as future generations will just want to get on with some semblance of life and to withhold that from those who had no choice into when they came into this world is not fair on them.
I think it could be done if we took control of the schools. I think they know that as well, that's why they push "groomer male teachers" so hard.
Their power is built on a base of brainwashed kids and could fall if we took that control from them.
Their strategy is identical to Nazism, they aim to get the kids before they have the capability to think independently.
Something has to give as future generations will just want to get on with some semblance of life and to withhold that from those who had no choice into when they came into this world is not fair on them.
Maybe. After everything I've seen, I don't know when the crack will turn into a chasm, but it's coming.
Distractions like trannies and race war can only work for so long.
It has to break down completely before it can be rebuilt.
Neither boys nor girls should be subjected to this abuse. Her saying girls shouldn't be isn't incompatible with you saying boys shouldn't be, you idiot.
wut
Imp fails to understand that there are movements that hate anything good; they will tell a boy to cut his dick off and a girl to chop her tits off. Imp assumes anything bad is female, rather than demonic, in nature.
https://media.scored.co/post/lPlcFPDW3DY9.jpeg
Yes, Solanas. A walking demonic figure. I get it Imp, but her ideas are traceable. Her>Foucault (with his female groomers) >Sarte (and his female groomer) >Marx > etc; most had a penis.
Demonic figures don't exist, it's just tradcon cope.
So...why are you disagreeing? Also, Marx lived like a woman and supported women, so he can be an honorary woman.
To be honest, because I appreciate the role of women in society, and understand that it can go either way. You clearly understand that the role and impact of women is important but assume they're pure "bad." I think women must be guided in their ideas and behavior but are potentially good and ultimately essential to any society. Truth be told my ideas may be more "misogynistic" than yours.
You can tell who's a threat to them by how they respond.
When you're just annoying them, they call you a misogynist or an incel.
When you're hitting a weak point, they go silent, they use dirtier tactics and they hope you just go away.
I can't give a real reply to this because of Rule 16.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
The "inherently more evil" part is what crossed the line.
A TERF is shilling that the main victims of transgenderism are women, who not only are old enough to know better, but are also able to reverse their surgery in a way that males cannot.
Basically, Nazis doing Nazi things. You don't count as victims, because you aren't human to start with.
Hey Imp, I'm pretty sure that the #LetWomenSpeak group are solely focused on adult human females and are expanding into younger human females at this stage in their growth.
They'll hopefully coordinate with groups who can assist other specific communities of need and share best practice with them as they evolve.
Them helping young women isn't them forgetting about young men. Some help is better than no help.
Elsewhere you claim that these feminists now realize the damage they've done to boys and are starting to regret it. Yet, this logic makes little sense - if their main victims are boys, why start by helping girls? It is far more likely that they still don't really care about boys, yes, even their sons, because years and years of absorbing hateful propaganda about "men being trash" will do that to you. So, I'm not buying this at all. These women are still feminists. And feminists still only care about women and girls, and don't give a shit about men or boys apart from paying lip-service or using manipulative tactics that ultimately benefit women and girls at the expense of men and boys.
I accept that the core focus of #LetWomenSpeak is human females. That is the one thing they are focusing on and end goal.
I posit that any gains or wins for them will influence the balance of power across all representation, including men.
You're seeing good in people that don't possess any.
They won't do anything, because their entire purpose is to pull their own out of the way of the weapon they created.
All feminists are evil.
I'll grant you that this situation is indeed a direct consequence of earlier decisions made by militant feminists rubbing some men's faces in what they perceived as victories.
They suck and should be ashamed of what they've done.
The current situation though is that plenty have sat and allowed this to happen and are now taking action, be it baby steps or soft approaches, to try to remedy this situation.
You are right that once they've achieved their goal they will forget about hanging around to help any further, but it's documenting that entire process and using it for evidence that it exists which gives as all a place to argue from.
You don't have to look far to see all of these opinionated militant feminists shitting themselves because they ended up with sons, which they love, and realise that their futures are fucked because of what their mothers took part in.
It's not all carnage, well not all the way down anyway, but hopefully we can all get through this and leave it better than we found it.
It's much darker than that. As the link I posted to the other user shows, radical feminism is directly responsible for pushing this on kids, it was one of their goals.
Shame isn't enough. Nuremberg is enough. Real, lasting consequences and complete destruction of feminism. That's all I'm willing to accept.
I literally have never seen this. I've seen them talking about aborting a baby if it's a boy, but never this. I think you're talking about women in general, which maybe can be argued, but open feminists are unforgivable scum who should be thrown out of society.
Maybe after that we can attempt to rebuild gender relations, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
That's unattainable Imp, but hold onto it if you think that the compromise can be pulled further in that direction if you want. The other side already hold onto their grip on that tug-of-war rope in that sense.
Something has to give as future generations will just want to get on with some semblance of life and to withhold that from those who had no choice into when they came into this world is not fair on them.
I think it could be done if we took control of the schools. I think they know that as well, that's why they push "groomer male teachers" so hard.
Their power is built on a base of brainwashed kids and could fall if we took that control from them.
Their strategy is identical to Nazism, they aim to get the kids before they have the capability to think independently.
Maybe. After everything I've seen, I don't know when the crack will turn into a chasm, but it's coming.
Distractions like trannies and race war can only work for so long.
It has to break down completely before it can be rebuilt.
Neither boys nor girls should be subjected to this abuse. Her saying girls shouldn't be isn't incompatible with you saying boys shouldn't be, you idiot.
Is this where someone posts the image of the dude asking wtf another people misinterpreting his tweets?
https://pomf2.lain.la/f/2o46e7f.webp