..yeah I ain't expecting ANY governmental institution to follow it, it just means when we catch them it might be easier to sue and get some money out if it.
The sad thing is that there was nothing to clarify. It's been understood forever that the government "asking" or "suggesting" that a third party do something converts that party into a government agent, subject to the same restrictions as the government itself.
presumably, before most of the people currently disregarding it were born.
The entire leadership of the Left which has captured institutions is 70+, so they would all remember 1963, if they could remember anything, because half of them have dementia.
It's good that the law has been clarified...
..yeah I ain't expecting ANY governmental institution to follow it, it just means when we catch them it might be easier to sue and get some money out if it.
The sad thing is that there was nothing to clarify. It's been understood forever that the government "asking" or "suggesting" that a third party do something converts that party into a government agent, subject to the same restrictions as the government itself.
The key point in question - the Bantam test - was decided in 1963, presumably, before most of the people currently disregarding it were born.
The entire leadership of the Left which has captured institutions is 70+, so they would all remember 1963, if they could remember anything, because half of them have dementia.