Is this like the state bar in the US, where a lawyer has to join to practice law? Basically a warped implementation of the medieval guild system.
So they compelled lawyers to swear an oath that they shared the political opinion of the bar in order to practice? Nothing authoritarian there, LoL.
Oh Canada, if only you had a real bill of rights and the guns for people to demand the government follow it. I guess you'll just have to settle for being Castro Jr.'s budget banana republic.
To answer your initial semi-rhetorical question, yes, it is. You must be a member and you must take this oath to practice in Ontario. You can have a law degree (JD, LLB, etc.) but you cannot represent a client in legal matters without LSO membership.
Fun fact, they used to be the Law Society of Upper Canada, but that wasn't woke enough. The name "implied superiority over Quebec," and alluded to a time of "First Nations oppression," so it was changed as little more than an opportunity for leftists to flex.
The Upper (Ontario)and Lower (Quebec) Canada nomenclature was also a quaint colonial relic in that Quebec is further north by latitude than Southern Ontario, making it confusing.
But the original Upper/Lower Canada distinction seems to arise that Toronto (York) and Kingston were further up river (actually on Lake Ontario) wrt the St. Lawrence, which would've been the main route of travel at the time.
Yes, these are clubs that you are forced to join in order to practice a profession. Kind of like a union that you're forced to join on account of having a job.
Basically, leftist BS. I'm sure a lot of people have excuses for why occupational licensing is necessary, but I believe in caveat emptor.
Is this like the state bar in the US, where a lawyer has to join to practice law? Basically a warped implementation of the medieval guild system.
So they compelled lawyers to swear an oath that they shared the political opinion of the bar in order to practice? Nothing authoritarian there, LoL.
Oh Canada, if only you had a real bill of rights and the guns for people to demand the government follow it. I guess you'll just have to settle for being Castro Jr.'s budget banana republic.
To answer your initial semi-rhetorical question, yes, it is. You must be a member and you must take this oath to practice in Ontario. You can have a law degree (JD, LLB, etc.) but you cannot represent a client in legal matters without LSO membership.
Fun fact, they used to be the Law Society of Upper Canada, but that wasn't woke enough. The name "implied superiority over Quebec," and alluded to a time of "First Nations oppression," so it was changed as little more than an opportunity for leftists to flex.
The Upper (Ontario)and Lower (Quebec) Canada nomenclature was also a quaint colonial relic in that Quebec is further north by latitude than Southern Ontario, making it confusing.
But the original Upper/Lower Canada distinction seems to arise that Toronto (York) and Kingston were further up river (actually on Lake Ontario) wrt the St. Lawrence, which would've been the main route of travel at the time.
Yes, these are clubs that you are forced to join in order to practice a profession. Kind of like a union that you're forced to join on account of having a job.
Basically, leftist BS. I'm sure a lot of people have excuses for why occupational licensing is necessary, but I believe in caveat emptor.