Gizortnik's rhetorical style is not totally logical. He makes dozens of points that appear to be directly applicable but can't sit still to discuss any particular one for long. He knows this is frustrating, so I can only conclude that he either doesn't care about persuading anyone or is a victim of crippling Adderall abuse.
There are times when it's helpful to write a 3000 word rant... arguing online is not one of them.
I dunno . . . I find many of his rants informative and entertaining. I'm not exactly pressed for time, so length doesn't bother me if the message is interesting, clear, and persuasive.
Gizortnik's rhetorical style is not totally logical. He makes dozens of points that appear to be directly applicable but can't sit still to discuss any particular one for long. He knows this is frustrating, so I can only conclude that he either doesn't care about persuading anyone or is a victim of crippling Adderall abuse.
There are times when it's helpful to write a 3000 word rant... arguing online is not one of them.
I dunno . . . I find many of his rants informative and entertaining. I'm not exactly pressed for time, so length doesn't bother me if the message is interesting, clear, and persuasive.
It's fine as long as you're not arguing with him, which means contesting the claims he makes.