Assuming this happened (it didn't) what she is asking for here is to destroy the entire legal system just to give women an unshakeable instant win card.
This is a feature, not a bug. She knows exactly what she is doing and she is doing it to give women the power of the state to use against men at their whim. She wants this power for herself and others like her.
The checks and balances on the system are a problem when one seeks to manipulate the system to their advantage. She is not concerned that this will backfire because she is a woman, and thus personally immune to accusations of rape or sexual assault from men. It may backfire by affecting her male relatives, but more than likely she is not concerned about male suffering, seeing them only cogs in the machine to serve her (or she believes her ability to manipulate other women will allow her to rise to the top of the female hierarchy, and thus have to power to impose her own self-interest on the system).
That's why all feminism is doomed to fail when it tries to "empower" women, because the moment they are faced with actually dealing with a decision they will always default back to being cowardly little waifs who can't do anything without a man to take care of them.
You continue to misunderstand women then. For women, being, or pretending to be, "cowardly little waifs" is exactly how they gain power, because they use that to manipulate men to their own advantage.
Far too many "conservative" and "red-pilled" men continue to misunderstand this about women. The comment refrain "women are children" is a clear example of this*. Women are not children. They are intelligent adults. Except, unlike men, they almost entirely focus their intelligence on how to manipulate other people, both men and women, to get their way.
* "Women are children" actually has some truth to it but not in the way most people use it. Children also tend to try to use manipulative tactics to get their way, e.g. a child crying until their parents give them what they want. Of course, women are significantly more adept at this than children (and men), having honed their skills in their peer groups as teenagers.
No, I get that that's the point. I simply think women aren't smart enough to actually be playing that game deliberately. They want to be that empowered megabitch girl boss, until the moment the wind slightly changes against them. Then millions of years of evolution override it all and they are gleefully back to be children.
The same way that a girl is super tough and willing to throwhands like a bar wench, but then a man raises his voice at her and she starts crying instantly.
Some certainly do play up that waifish shit deliberately, but those aren't also the ones pushing the (formerly) radfed narratives about girl power openly. Because it would cut into their angle and break kayfabe.
That's why you think I'm not understanding. You give them credit as "intelligent adults," I do not. If they were, then you are absolutely correct. I simply do not give them that credit, as I don't think they are nearly as smart as people think they are. Being able to manipulate isn't a sign of intellect, even dogs manage to do it in much the same manners and they aren't "intelligent adults" (well, relatively, some are quite smart for an animal).
This is a feature, not a bug. She knows exactly what she is doing and she is doing it to give women the power of the state to use against men at their whim. She wants this power for herself and others like her.
The checks and balances on the system are a problem when one seeks to manipulate the system to their advantage. She is not concerned that this will backfire because she is a woman, and thus personally immune to accusations of rape or sexual assault from men. It may backfire by affecting her male relatives, but more than likely she is not concerned about male suffering, seeing them only cogs in the machine to serve her (or she believes her ability to manipulate other women will allow her to rise to the top of the female hierarchy, and thus have to power to impose her own self-interest on the system).
You continue to misunderstand women then. For women, being, or pretending to be, "cowardly little waifs" is exactly how they gain power, because they use that to manipulate men to their own advantage.
Far too many "conservative" and "red-pilled" men continue to misunderstand this about women. The comment refrain "women are children" is a clear example of this*. Women are not children. They are intelligent adults. Except, unlike men, they almost entirely focus their intelligence on how to manipulate other people, both men and women, to get their way.
* "Women are children" actually has some truth to it but not in the way most people use it. Children also tend to try to use manipulative tactics to get their way, e.g. a child crying until their parents give them what they want. Of course, women are significantly more adept at this than children (and men), having honed their skills in their peer groups as teenagers.
No, I get that that's the point. I simply think women aren't smart enough to actually be playing that game deliberately. They want to be that empowered megabitch girl boss, until the moment the wind slightly changes against them. Then millions of years of evolution override it all and they are gleefully back to be children.
The same way that a girl is super tough and willing to throwhands like a bar wench, but then a man raises his voice at her and she starts crying instantly.
Some certainly do play up that waifish shit deliberately, but those aren't also the ones pushing the (formerly) radfed narratives about girl power openly. Because it would cut into their angle and break kayfabe.
That's why you think I'm not understanding. You give them credit as "intelligent adults," I do not. If they were, then you are absolutely correct. I simply do not give them that credit, as I don't think they are nearly as smart as people think they are. Being able to manipulate isn't a sign of intellect, even dogs manage to do it in much the same manners and they aren't "intelligent adults" (well, relatively, some are quite smart for an animal).