It's not meant to make sense, it's a feel good virtue signal that's supposed to pander to women and make them feel like they can be a tough warrior chick even if they're under five foot and can barely carry their shopping home. This is an old one but they spread propaganda ages ago like this about women in the workplace. Now the women who did go that route are complete stereotypical wrecks and look permanently miserable.
I agree, I'm only 33 but I'm old enough to remember all the shit women gave all of us men constantly over even noticing what was going on. Even with the biological clock blatantly ticking and they know it they still maintain the attitude problem they've got towards men. This is why I'm so unsympathetic to them having their female only spaces invaded by trannies.
I honestly wonder if they won't go feminist Taliban on us at some point and demand state mandated husbands because I wouldn't put it past them. It seems they're that miserable now though they've largely lost the will to do anything except bitch on social media and have very public tantrums.
I'm only a little younger than you are, and like you I've witnessed the rise in whereareallthegoodmen types over the last decade or so. Men are getting red pilled at unsustainable rates from a civilizational perspective.
I've always said that if women had even 1% of the difficulty that men do in dating the feminists would have the government regulating the dating market. I don't see state mandated husbands becoming a thing though, because for once female hypergamy will be our saving grace. The juice just isn't worth the squeeze for a cat lady to enslave Joe Shmoe working the $15/hr job at Walmart that DIE policies have condemned him to. I think it's more likely that we'll see a continuation of the trend of soft polygyny, with women sharing the top men and polyamorous cuck harems appearing at the extreme lower end of the SMV scale.
The fundamental problem is that there aren't enough well to do men to go around, and the ones that exist aren't going to be supporting more than one woman, especially not 35+ feminist cat ladies. I suppose those guys could be enslaved, but I don't see that happening because unlike bottom 80% men those guys are actually valued by society. The real trick is to hide any wealth that you do have so you don't attract gold diggers.
That's one major concern I have about graduating with my masters. I've already been sized up for betabuxxing once, and while it was good practice in staving that off it's not an experience I want to repeat.
It's not meant to make sense, it's a feel good virtue signal that's supposed to pander to women and make them feel like they can be a tough warrior chick even if they're under five foot and can barely carry their shopping home. This is an old one but they spread propaganda ages ago like this about women in the workplace. Now the women who did go that route are complete stereotypical wrecks and look permanently miserable.
Had anyone tried to warn them of this fate beforehand they would have been called misogynists by those very women. Fuck them.
I agree, I'm only 33 but I'm old enough to remember all the shit women gave all of us men constantly over even noticing what was going on. Even with the biological clock blatantly ticking and they know it they still maintain the attitude problem they've got towards men. This is why I'm so unsympathetic to them having their female only spaces invaded by trannies.
I honestly wonder if they won't go feminist Taliban on us at some point and demand state mandated husbands because I wouldn't put it past them. It seems they're that miserable now though they've largely lost the will to do anything except bitch on social media and have very public tantrums.
I'm only a little younger than you are, and like you I've witnessed the rise in whereareallthegoodmen types over the last decade or so. Men are getting red pilled at unsustainable rates from a civilizational perspective.
I've always said that if women had even 1% of the difficulty that men do in dating the feminists would have the government regulating the dating market. I don't see state mandated husbands becoming a thing though, because for once female hypergamy will be our saving grace. The juice just isn't worth the squeeze for a cat lady to enslave Joe Shmoe working the $15/hr job at Walmart that DIE policies have condemned him to. I think it's more likely that we'll see a continuation of the trend of soft polygyny, with women sharing the top men and polyamorous cuck harems appearing at the extreme lower end of the SMV scale.
The fundamental problem is that there aren't enough well to do men to go around, and the ones that exist aren't going to be supporting more than one woman, especially not 35+ feminist cat ladies. I suppose those guys could be enslaved, but I don't see that happening because unlike bottom 80% men those guys are actually valued by society. The real trick is to hide any wealth that you do have so you don't attract gold diggers.
That's one major concern I have about graduating with my masters. I've already been sized up for betabuxxing once, and while it was good practice in staving that off it's not an experience I want to repeat.