If you create something using AI that is worthwhile to other people, why should you not get the same copyright protections that anybody else gets for their work?
Because they're creating something and you're selecting something.
When you use something like stable diffusion, those images you created are already in there; anybody with the same seed and prompt gets the same image. So it's really akin to a giant book of clipart and you're flipping through it or using the index to find the section on "your prompt"; you don't get copyright over clipart because you flipped to the right page and selected a particular one. The large AI models are just "zip files" that compress all the outputs into a small (relatively) file size.
So if the output is copyrightable it's the maker of the AI who created the outputs. AIs recreating copyrighted works shows that they "contain" copyrighted works, and all their outputs are math so functionally exist when the AI is made.
You might want to think about that before insisting the works of AI are copyrightable, because instead of getting a work for free you're going to end up paying somebody else for it - Google, or Open AI, or Baidu most likely.
Because they're creating something and you're selecting something.
When you use something like stable diffusion, those images you created are already in there; anybody with the same seed and prompt gets the same image. So it's really akin to a giant book of clipart and you're flipping through it or using the index to find the section on "your prompt"; you don't get copyright over clipart because you flipped to the right page and selected a particular one. The large AI models are just "zip files" that compress all the outputs into a small (relatively) file size.
So if the output is copyrightable it's the maker of the AI who created the outputs. AIs recreating copyrighted works shows that they "contain" copyrighted works, and all their outputs are math so functionally exist when the AI is made.
You might want to think about that before insisting the works of AI are copyrightable, because instead of getting a work for free you're going to end up paying somebody else for it - Google, or Open AI, or Baidu most likely.
And when someone draws something, they've also seen all of the images they're aping.
You completely ignored the whole rest of my argument, so I'll ignore the rest of yours.
This is what being wrong looks like. Run away.
Don't act like a faggot redditor.
Don't act like a faggot redditor.