The study:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016028962200023X
The stated purpose:
we investigated whether individuals with IQs ≤ 90 who completed college experienced the same social and economic benefits higher-IQ college graduates did.
The hilarious accidental money shot:
Although most individuals with IQs ≤ 90 did not have a college degree, the rate at which they completed college had increased approximately 6-fold in men and 10-fold in women relative to rates in the previous generation.
So the researchers were trying to instill confidence in their sample size, but they inadvertent revealed what most of us have suspected for years: colleges are rubber stamping degrees for stupid people in general and stupid women in particular.
Given average white IQ is ten points higher than 90 while average black IQ is five points lower, it’s probably safe to assume that most of these cognitively challenged college grads are black women a.k.a. the most insufferable and belligerent demographic on the planet.
We’re fast tracking literal retards into positions of authority and influence because muh racism. Bodes well!
IIRC, in middle-class households, black girls don't have the statistical propensity for criminality at black males do. As women have a narrower IQ variance, I dunno if black American women average closer to 86 or 100. Of course anything beneath what is currently 105 iq is dismally inadequate for a sustainable civilization.
Dude have you actually interacted with black women? They are very loud and aggressive compared to other races. Yelling, arguing, and fighting are so common in black girls that black dudes don't even want them.
Imagine a hard day slanging crack rocks on the streets and you come home and Latisha starts hollering. Smh these poor brothers
I live in a white/hispanic location, the very few black women here are indistinguishable from white women. There is a heap of hispanic trailer trash (I.E. aggressive, not merely being poor).
90+ IQ peoples are still usable in society. Not "valuable", or "useful", but "usable". They're still valid sources of simplistic labor that has not yet been automated: Walmart greeters, day-laborers, farm harvesters, chicken catchers, and with the aid of modern guidance technology delivery drivers. A society can be sustainable with a large amount of these types of simplified labor jobs still existing. Obviously higher IQ would be better, even in these jobs, but "usable".
They don't directly commit violent crimes, but the way they brought up their niglets certainly was a contributing factor. Their petty crimes such as theft and welfare frauds are usually not prosecuted
Basically they're the perfect cross-section for affluenza.
They average below that and you know that.