I wish people put as much energy towards foster care, adoption, etc. as they do towards abortion.
You mean the Christians who are the largest adoption population in the US? Make a better argument that’s grounded in something other than black pill conjecture.
Regardless of where you stand on abortion, making it outright illegal or heavily regulated is not really a realistic option. It will still happen, it will just be unregulated, dangerous, etc., etc.
Actions have consequences, saying that people will still commit a crime is not a good reason to legalize it.
The much better route is to encourage contraceptives, make people aware of the financial burdens, provide better tax credits and maternity leave, and a whole slew of things that would be infinitely more legislatively popular and reasonable when enforced.
Leftists have been doing this in sex ed for decades with negative success rates, why continue a shitty failed policy developed by legitimate pedophiles? Maternity leave is now so expansive it is a liability economically to any company hiring female employees, which is why many corporations fund abortions….
Are you a far leftist trying to larp? Because these arguments are hilariously bad, like ending cash bail levels of stupid.
No, this was a gimmick from funky statistics, they made comparative studies post roe compared to pre roe and then claimed it was access to contraception. What’s actually changed is the amount of teen marriages, which was fairly common even up to the 90s, and 18 year old wife getting pregnant was listed as a teen pregnancy. Unwed teen pregnancies are actually higher today compared to decades ago.
You mean the Christians who are the largest adoption population in the US? Make a better argument that’s grounded in something other than black pill conjecture.
Christians adopting the most doesn't offset the impact of banning abortion. If you think this is a gotcha, then I'm sorry to inform you that your retardation is terminal.
We already don't have enough people adopting, even among Christians. You think the issue wouldn't be worse if you forced people to carry to term?
Actions have consequences, saying that people will still commit a crime is not a good reason to legalize it.
This isn't a justification. You could use this argument to justify almost anything.
Leftists have been doing this in sex ed for decades with negative success rates
Then why are birth rates lower in poorer countries where it's taught even where abortions aren't generally available?
You actually don't have any arguments with real merit lmao.
Imagine thinking someone is far left because they know that trying to make abortion illegal is actually braindead retarded, regardless of whether you like abortion happening or not.
We already don't have enough people adopting, even among Christians. You think the issue wouldn't be worse if you forced people to carry to term?
Right because the issue was worse when abortion was illegal up till the 70s? When did single mothers skyrocket again?
This isn't a justification. You could use this argument to justify almost anything.
You don’t have an argument for why abortion should be legal. Murder is murder.
Then why are birth rates lower in poorer countries where it's taught even where abortions aren't generally available?
Looks at teen birth rates in California, looks at 60 million plus abortions in the us since Roe, looks at single parent rates in US. Yeah… that “method” is totally working! Notice how you couldn’t make a case for it being successful in the US and instantly had to pretend poorer countries teach safe sex and not rape condoms.
You mean the Christians who are the largest adoption population in the US? Make a better argument that’s grounded in something other than black pill conjecture.
Actions have consequences, saying that people will still commit a crime is not a good reason to legalize it.
Leftists have been doing this in sex ed for decades with negative success rates, why continue a shitty failed policy developed by legitimate pedophiles? Maternity leave is now so expansive it is a liability economically to any company hiring female employees, which is why many corporations fund abortions….
Are you a far leftist trying to larp? Because these arguments are hilariously bad, like ending cash bail levels of stupid.
No, this was a gimmick from funky statistics, they made comparative studies post roe compared to pre roe and then claimed it was access to contraception. What’s actually changed is the amount of teen marriages, which was fairly common even up to the 90s, and 18 year old wife getting pregnant was listed as a teen pregnancy. Unwed teen pregnancies are actually higher today compared to decades ago.
Christians adopting the most doesn't offset the impact of banning abortion. If you think this is a gotcha, then I'm sorry to inform you that your retardation is terminal.
We already don't have enough people adopting, even among Christians. You think the issue wouldn't be worse if you forced people to carry to term?
This isn't a justification. You could use this argument to justify almost anything.
Then why are birth rates lower in poorer countries where it's taught even where abortions aren't generally available?
You actually don't have any arguments with real merit lmao.
Imagine thinking someone is far left because they know that trying to make abortion illegal is actually braindead retarded, regardless of whether you like abortion happening or not.
Right because the issue was worse when abortion was illegal up till the 70s? When did single mothers skyrocket again?
You don’t have an argument for why abortion should be legal. Murder is murder.
Looks at teen birth rates in California, looks at 60 million plus abortions in the us since Roe, looks at single parent rates in US. Yeah… that “method” is totally working! Notice how you couldn’t make a case for it being successful in the US and instantly had to pretend poorer countries teach safe sex and not rape condoms.