That said, I'm still not convinced the majority is necessarily wrong. Based on what little information I have, it seems that the anti-ghost gun argument is wrong, but that does not automatically mean that there should be an injunction before the judicial process plays itself out.
Yeah, this is confusing. Here are some more documents. I read it as follows: Alito didn't stay anything, but presented the request for a stay to the court - which granted it with Alito opposed to granting it.
What a surprise, CNN is deceiving people again?
That said, I'm still not convinced the majority is necessarily wrong. Based on what little information I have, it seems that the anti-ghost gun argument is wrong, but that does not automatically mean that there should be an injunction before the judicial process plays itself out.
Yeah, this is confusing. Here are some more documents. I read it as follows: Alito didn't stay anything, but presented the request for a stay to the court - which granted it with Alito opposed to granting it.
If a thing is not a firearm, the atf shouldn't get to regulate it as one.
I'm not sure how this is complicated to anyone.