I considered it. He might say that convicting would lead to "women having more of an excuse to murder boys" or something like that. But more likely than not, I think he'd vote to convict.
His main problem is that he's totally detached from the real world, and there's nothing like being on a jury (I assume, I'm a Eurofag) to change that and force you to confront the facts.
I considered it. He might say that convicting would lead to "women having more of an excuse to murder boys" or something like that. But more likely than not, I think he'd vote to convict.
His main problem is that he's totally detached from the real world, and there's nothing like being on a jury (I assume, I'm a Eurofag) to change that and force you to confront the facts.
I have served on a jury before, and it does indeed force you to confront the facts and also the specificity of law.