I've been having sporadic problems with archives as well. That's an archive of Ben Shapiro saying he doesn't care about the browning of America. If Jews want my help, they need to bring something to the table in exchange for it. This case doesn't look something that is setting a legal precedent I should be concerned about. Perhaps that will change if the schools challenge the oversite.
You seem to be doing the liberal "first they came for X..." canard. That's always been bullshit. The state persecutes its enemies. It will do so regardless of said enemies standing up for some other third party. Legal precedents matter, but there is "shared struggle" going on here.
White nationalists have done coalitions with Jews before. This just happened with Trump, for example. It ended with W's for them and L's for us. That strategy is a proven failure.
That's an archive of Ben Shapiro saying he doesn't care about the browning of America.
Somehow, I had guessed that it had something to do with Ben Shapiro. But is he obliged to care about what you care about? He isn't demanding that you care about halacha. Shouldn't it be good enough if he supports your right to care about what you want to care about?
If Jews want my help, they need to bring something to the table in exchange for it.
Crafty, but I'm not sure they do. Nor mine, for that matter.
You seem to be doing the liberal "first they came for X..." canard. That's always been bullshit. The state persecutes its enemies. It will do so regardless of said enemies standing up for some other third party. Legal precedents matter, but there is "shared struggle" going on here.
There is no shared struggle, I assume you mean. But of course there is. If the state can divide and conquer its enemies, then it will have a much easier time than when communists stand up for white nationalists and vice versa, as much of an unrealistic utopian idea that is.
I'd like to make it as difficult as possible for the state to persecute its enemies, no matter who they are. I'm not a white nationalist (or whatever label you accept), but if you were persecuted in a specific way, then obviously I'd support you - as little as that is worth. Like I said, because it's unjust, and because it's in my self-interest.
White nationalists have done coalitions with Jews before. This just happened with Trump, for example. It ended with W's for them and L's for us.
And the new plan is to have a coalition that excludes Jews, or something?
Ben Shapiro's opinion is not obligated to be anything in particular. Ben Shapiro is obligated to be useful in helping me achieve political goals if he wants me to be useful toward his. Saying shit like he said is not useful. It's detrimental.
We are not divided from Jews, especially Orthodox. because of the state. Their ~2500 year old religion has division between Jew and gentile baked into it and has maintained that for millenia amidst the rise and fall of many states and empires.
And the new plan is to have a coalition that excludes Jews, or something?
The new plan is detachment from hyper-politics and Finklethink.
I've been having sporadic problems with archives as well. That's an archive of Ben Shapiro saying he doesn't care about the browning of America. If Jews want my help, they need to bring something to the table in exchange for it. This case doesn't look something that is setting a legal precedent I should be concerned about. Perhaps that will change if the schools challenge the oversite.
You seem to be doing the liberal "first they came for X..." canard. That's always been bullshit. The state persecutes its enemies. It will do so regardless of said enemies standing up for some other third party. Legal precedents matter, but there is "shared struggle" going on here.
White nationalists have done coalitions with Jews before. This just happened with Trump, for example. It ended with W's for them and L's for us. That strategy is a proven failure.
Somehow, I had guessed that it had something to do with Ben Shapiro. But is he obliged to care about what you care about? He isn't demanding that you care about halacha. Shouldn't it be good enough if he supports your right to care about what you want to care about?
Crafty, but I'm not sure they do. Nor mine, for that matter.
There is no shared struggle, I assume you mean. But of course there is. If the state can divide and conquer its enemies, then it will have a much easier time than when communists stand up for white nationalists and vice versa, as much of an unrealistic utopian idea that is.
I'd like to make it as difficult as possible for the state to persecute its enemies, no matter who they are. I'm not a white nationalist (or whatever label you accept), but if you were persecuted in a specific way, then obviously I'd support you - as little as that is worth. Like I said, because it's unjust, and because it's in my self-interest.
And the new plan is to have a coalition that excludes Jews, or something?
Ben Shapiro's opinion is not obligated to be anything in particular. Ben Shapiro is obligated to be useful in helping me achieve political goals if he wants me to be useful toward his. Saying shit like he said is not useful. It's detrimental.
We are not divided from Jews, especially Orthodox. because of the state. Their ~2500 year old religion has division between Jew and gentile baked into it and has maintained that for millenia amidst the rise and fall of many states and empires.
The new plan is detachment from hyper-politics and Finklethink.