What do we have here?
(kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Oh, there's a lot more argumentation about that; both from religious requirements and from the fact that most European jews don't believe the Ethiopians. TBH, they're probably wrong, but this is why a genetic test is not now, and never will be enough to confirm a right of return. If the jews integrate into the local majority population, Judaism's lack of understanding of genetics means that they will also genetically integrate into the local population. You might have a little bit of Ashkenazi genetics in you, but what makes you a Jew is not being Ashkenazi, but being jewish.
Would you call the Rawandan Genocide a Black Genocide? Because I wouldn't, for the same reason I wouldn't call the Holocaust or Holodomor a "White Genocide". It's a genocide of black people, but it's not really a black genocide. The word 'black' is trying to refer to whom is being genocide. Clearly blacks aren't being exterminated in wholesale because it's being done by blacks who are exterminating blacks. The Black Feet's massacres against other tribes isn't an "Indian Genocide". The reference wouldn't make sense. Who is the target of genocide, is what you refer to it as. The Rawandan Genocide, as a name, is just American reductionism to geography because they don't know where anything is. It's short for "the genocide in Rawanda". It is actually a Tutsi Genocide.
Now, that being said, you can argue that WW2 was a Democide by multiple states that basically exterminated huge swathes of their population unnecessarily, but that's not the same thing.
A White Genocide would be better defined by what happened in Hati. In Hati, no ethnic or political distinctions were made regarding white populations. French, English, Germans, all of them were mass executed or married off, by a racialist who pulled a "Year 0" maneuver and declared the country to be "Black" by force. That is a white genocide because it wasn't just one particular ethnic group that was targeted, but all whites.
That concept of whiteness is bullshit because Ignatiev started it from a national socialist presupposition that a bourgeois race can exist.
White as a British construct is something that has changed with time, because the Americanization of the concept has broadened it significantly. When Enoch Powell warned of non-white immigration to Britain, he wasn't arguing that flooding the country with Albanians would be fine. His concept of "White" was effectively WASP. Being that England is an explicitly white, anglo-saxon, protestant country; his point is obvious. I bet he'd have a problem if the Danes invaded again too.
There is a difference between integrating and assimilating. If Jews were assimilated, you wouldn't have to go out of your way to avoid buying kosher certified crap (and paying a premium for doing so) when you shop for groceries. That's the opposite of assimilation.
There may be some dispute about the Ethiopian Jews among some people, but no such dispute exists for European gentiles. If you try to get into to Israel based upon being descendant from a line of Englishmen, they're going to think you are insane.
Ignatiev's take (at face value) on race was that it was a social construct to divide the working class. It's along the same lines as yours since you both are arguing that people are just de-racinated economic units. That's been the Marxist take on race for a long time.
Also, as I've said before, the whole religion of Judaism revolves around their mythology about being the supposed descendants of Abraham. Their whole religion and its traditions are therefore based around "blood and soil" claims to modern day Israel. Israel is not in Europe.
You left these points on the board, fam. If you think Jews are just white people, why are you so tolerant of Jewish Nationalism and not White (gentile) Nationalism? You told me in the past that you would rather SJWs win than White Nationalists. That's how much you hate us, yet you have no problem cheerleading for rabid Jewish Nationalists like Donald Trump. Clearly you make a distinction, even if you are cagey about its nature and perhaps self-deceiving about it.