I like football as a sport because it is such a tactical and strategic game, and I never got why people stereotyped it as a "sport for meatheads". But, its a shame that the biggest and most prominent football league and competition in the us (and in the world) is cucked as fucked (as pretty much every other major sporting league is). It's funny too because I doubt the subhuman faggots who would get mad over what a shock jock radio host said are the type of people who play and watch football anyways. It's funny too because soccer leagues in europe are less pozzed than this, and soccer was always known as the "pussy sport".
Yes. A cricket match takes a long Ng time to play. There was a simplified version called "Rounders" popularised in schools. It is quicker to play and focuses on big, spectacular hits.
Cricket is (at the core) a game of defense. The batting team defends the wicket from the attacks of the bowler while also trying to make runs to score. It is absolutely a game of endurance, with a test match lasting a couple days, and a Test Series is about five games.
There are shorter versions of cricket matches, with one day matches (50 overs) and 20/20 (20 overs) and they require differences in strategy.
To sum up, an international Test Match Series has deep strategy, where the resources of the bowler meet the risk-taking of the batsmen over days.
I know it looks a bit dry, but if you like baseball you should watch a game of 20/20 and see if you can come to grips with the reasons the players are doing what they are doing.
I like football as a sport because it is such a tactical and strategic game, and I never got why people stereotyped it as a "sport for meatheads". But, its a shame that the biggest and most prominent football league and competition in the us (and in the world) is cucked as fucked (as pretty much every other major sporting league is). It's funny too because I doubt the subhuman faggots who would get mad over what a shock jock radio host said are the type of people who play and watch football anyways. It's funny too because soccer leagues in europe are less pozzed than this, and soccer was always known as the "pussy sport".
True. Football is tactical and strategic but I’d say baseball is more so. Or maybe more analytical. Granted it’s my favorite sport but I’m biased.
Sure thing bloke. Now go watch some analysis of a Test Cricket match.
Baseball has some roots in cricket right?
Yes. A cricket match takes a long Ng time to play. There was a simplified version called "Rounders" popularised in schools. It is quicker to play and focuses on big, spectacular hits.
Cricket is (at the core) a game of defense. The batting team defends the wicket from the attacks of the bowler while also trying to make runs to score. It is absolutely a game of endurance, with a test match lasting a couple days, and a Test Series is about five games.
There are shorter versions of cricket matches, with one day matches (50 overs) and 20/20 (20 overs) and they require differences in strategy.
To sum up, an international Test Match Series has deep strategy, where the resources of the bowler meet the risk-taking of the batsmen over days.
I know it looks a bit dry, but if you like baseball you should watch a game of 20/20 and see if you can come to grips with the reasons the players are doing what they are doing.