You want wind so you do not put more CO2 in the atmosphere so you cut down trees that not only help regulate CO2 but they are also a habitat for the wildlife the same people pretend to care about.
Not sure how much energy do windmills produce but it makes me question if anyone involved in this made any calculation on the effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
You want wind so you do not put more CO2 in the atmosphere so you cut down trees that not only help regulate CO2 but they are also a habitat for the wildlife the same people pretend to care about.
Not sure how much energy do windmills produce but it makes me question if anyone involved in this made any calculation on the effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
Okay but there are also literally people out there who believe they can communicate with bugs.
Don't lump crazies in with regular people, it only gives weight to their beliefs
About 350ppm
And that number is based on, what?
Understood data of the effects of carbon concentration