Now, if you want to fight this through an argument based around a State's power that'd probably be easier. The lists and things required to prohibit users from accessing xxx material as the UK was talking about, for a basic example off the top of my head.
I'm forced to defend their ability to communicate with minors because I want complete liberty in the exchange of information.
To fight against govt censorship I must support the purveyance of the obscene to the innocent??
Fuck. Everything.
Why must stopping "the purveyance of the obscene to the innocent" be considered censorship?
Another pitfall of freespeech absolutism.
Now, if you want to fight this through an argument based around a State's power that'd probably be easier. The lists and things required to prohibit users from accessing xxx material as the UK was talking about, for a basic example off the top of my head.
The biggest pitfall of free speech absolutism is how completely retarded it is.