Not to mention, that cross-examining Hitler scene is clearly written by someone who had no reference to Adolph Hitler, as none of Hitler's actual arguments or perspectives from his books or speeches were clearly used.
Buddy - not once in the 80 years since WW2 have hitlers “actual arguments” or “perspectives from his books” made it into a single one of the (gorillions of) pieces of media about him and the nazis produced in the mainstream - or can you think of any?
Like I said, it's not an ideological treatise. It's a drama. It doesn't present his perspective regarding his family, the war, his issues with the military, his bizarre and precarious command position in the end of the war, etc.
Buddy - not once in the 80 years since WW2 have hitlers “actual arguments” or “perspectives from his books” made it into a single one of the (gorillions of) pieces of media about him and the nazis produced in the mainstream - or can you think of any?
Downfall.
Wasn't really an ideological piece, but more of a drama.
Which part of downfall explains hitlers “actual arguments” or “perspectives from his book”?
Like I said, it's not an ideological treatise. It's a drama. It doesn't present his perspective regarding his family, the war, his issues with the military, his bizarre and precarious command position in the end of the war, etc.