prominent figures in the RW sphere are at each other's throats about their favorite candidate.
but why? isn't it exceedingly obvious now that voter fraud is way past the point of no return? what the fuck does it matter which of these is "more likely" to win when an arbitrary number of Democrat votes will materialize at 3AM? just gotta vote harder?
focusing on the candidates is 100% a distraction.
I explained this clearly - it was not a decision by the vice president to call the election fraudulent, but to honor the states' LAWFUL DEMANDS that their slate of electoral votes be returned pending an investigation, and to use executive power to intercede when the judicial branch was ignoring it's constitutional duty to the state governments. The federal serves at the behest of the states, not the other way around. You didn't reply because you are wrong, and this days later attempt at brushing it off because you can't accept being wrong is beneath the standards you've claimed in the past.
The vice president had the duty to refuse to ratify because of the states having the right to demand their grievances be addressed.
There was no such demand. Neither the governor, nor the state legislature made such a demand. It is therefore definitely not 'lawful'.
But people here will approve of any comment that screams "FRAUD!!!!" no matter how illogical.
Yeah, that's completely arbitrary - if that is a valid ground, why didn't Nixon in 1960, Gore in 2000 or Biden in 2016 do it?
That's what it was designed to be, but the federal Leviathan definitely has made all the other governments its handmaiden.
Well, now you're receiving a reply, because I'm in the right and you're in the wrong. You're not just wrong, but you're badly wrong.
I'd love for nothing more than to be able to PROVE massive electoral fraud in the US. But while I have seen many shenanigans, no smoking gun, nor any indication that whatever fraud there was, was widespread.
I do find it very persuasive that there was a lot of legal shenanigans. I focus on that, rather than wild claims that cannot be substantiated, let alone proven.
Where does this 'duty' originate"
Already addressed - no state made any such demand.
And now you're just spewing bullshit. I'm not trawling through years of documents to show you the proof we all saw in 2020 where you clearly weren't paying attention. You also claim that things that happened did not, like state governments protesting and the massive lawsuit that the supreme court chose to ignore on a bullshit ruling (no standing).
There were hours of hearings in state governments like pennsylvania. There was statistical analysis and digital analysis proving fraud and crime. You're on a backup site provided by thedonald and yet you clearly did not actually follow anything going on during that time.
You're not just wrong, you're arrogantly and aggressively wrong. Fix yourself.
Great, then show me even one state government officially protesting, which is what you claimed.
There was no official protest anywhere. I was hoping that the PA legislature would send in an alternative slate of electors, but they didn't.