I don't think we can trust what you've seen because you seem to hallucinate whatever you want.
Who are 'we'? I guess you are in the "it's not happening" stage. When it's shown to you that this is how, yes, Westoids argue, you'll be "yes, we do and it's good that we do".
Russia uses mines in Ukraine.
BREAKING NEWS
Dropping a potential mine (cluster munitions) on top a minefield doesn't change anything.
Quite apart from the sheer absurdity of the claim... are the Russians deployed in the middle of minefields? Or are minefields a barrier? And you know beforehand that they will only land in minefields, eh?
By the way, how do you justify your war criminal leaders dumping cluster munitions into Yugoslavia? I'm pretty sure there weren't any mine fields in Belgrade or Kosovo. THAT WAS LIKE FOUR DAYS AGO.
The end.
The media told you what you're supposed to believe, and you brook no counterargument.
I guess you can cry about to the international criminal courts
Oh, the same ones that indicted Americans for murdering hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people in Iraq?
THAT WAS LIKE FOUR DAYS AGO, FIVE DAYS AGO. DON'T BRING IT UP!
right after your guy stands trial for stealing children
You'll do anything to defend the war crimes of the Western regimes and advance whatever narrative CNN tells you to advance, at least on this issue. You'll defend any war crime when it's your senile leader committing them. How sad.
Russia saved kids, while your shithole country drones them.
Wars of aggression are bad. No matter who is doing them. In the past the US has done them, and that was bad. Now Russia is doing it and it is bad. You know this. Russia is in the wrong in this entire war. That's why you have to keep bringing up past western transgressions. Because you know this is a Russian war of conquest and you know it is wrong.
But now it's cured of wars of aggression? Even though it wasn't ruling out invading the Solomon Islands if it were to allow a Chinese military base?
Russia is in the wrong in this entire war.
Russia is absolutely in the right. 30 years of provocations, expanding NATO even though you (= USG) promised you wouldn't, arming Ukraine in order to better terrorize the Russian population of the Donbas. Oh wait, those were good bombs and good cluster munitions fired into the city center of Donetsk. The West and its puppets can do no wrong, except in the past. It was one nanosecond ago, which means it doesn't count and Russian "war crimes" of saving children do. Love you guys, though I don't understand what you tell yourself to avoid cognitive dissonance.
That's why you have to keep bringing up past western transgressions
That's why I have to bring up stuff that shows you to be the hypocrites that you are.
I don't recall American banks being sanctioned during one of its many wars of aggression, nor American athletes being banned from competing under what they call their flag. Huh, it's almost as if the state religion of the West is hypocrisy.
Because you know this is a Russian war of conquest and you know it is wrong.
I think it's entirely right for Russia to reconquer lands it possessed for 200 years. The US didn't allow the Southern states to secede, did it? The only thing that saddens me is that so many people die (due to the actions of the regimes in the West), whether they are Russians or Ukrainians.
Ah yes, remember when NATO rolled tanks into Sweden and Finland and forced them to join? It's a volunteer organization my dude. This false equivalence is the most baffling zigger cope that I just can't figure out.
Wars of aggression are bad. What? Do we finally agree?
Maybe?
I think it's entirely right for Russia to reconquer lands
Oops, I guess not. Honestly your brain needs to be medically documented.
The US didn't allow the Southern states to secede
You .. you know the US fought a war of independence from an imperial power, right? The parallels to Ukraine are pretty strong.
Ah yes, remember when NATO rolled tanks into Sweden and Finland and forced them to join? It's a volunteer organization my dude.
If it's a 'volunteer organization', does that mean that no one is allowed to object to an aggressive, cluster bomb-using alliance moving to its borders? Well, ready yourself to use your excuse of "THAT WAS IN THE PAST" again, because I distinctly remember something called the Cuban Missile Crisis, my dude, where Cuba voluntarily allowed Soviet troops and missles on its territory, and your country threatened world annihilation over it.,
Oops, I guess not. Honestly your brain needs to be medically documented.
I guess you're now condemning your own Abe Lincoln.
You .. you know the US fought a war of independence from an imperial power, right? The parallels to Ukraine are pretty strong.
The parallels between the US and Ukraine are extremely strong. A region of the country attempted to secede, and the central government took action and reconquered that area.
BTW, just noting that you were unable to offer a defense of your "volunteer organization" flooding Yugoslavia with cluster munitions. I guess "there wuz minez there already n sheeit" didn't fly there, and CNN hadn't told you what to say.
(don't take offense at my aggressive tone, however wrong you are about this, I know you're probably right about some other things or you wouldn't be here)
Who are 'we'? I guess you are in the "it's not happening" stage. When it's shown to you that this is how, yes, Westoids argue, you'll be "yes, we do and it's good that we do".
BREAKING NEWS
Quite apart from the sheer absurdity of the claim... are the Russians deployed in the middle of minefields? Or are minefields a barrier? And you know beforehand that they will only land in minefields, eh?
By the way, how do you justify your war criminal leaders dumping cluster munitions into Yugoslavia? I'm pretty sure there weren't any mine fields in Belgrade or Kosovo. THAT WAS LIKE FOUR DAYS AGO.
The media told you what you're supposed to believe, and you brook no counterargument.
Oh, the same ones that indicted Americans for murdering hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people in Iraq?
THAT WAS LIKE FOUR DAYS AGO, FIVE DAYS AGO. DON'T BRING IT UP!
You'll do anything to defend the war crimes of the Western regimes and advance whatever narrative CNN tells you to advance, at least on this issue. You'll defend any war crime when it's your senile leader committing them. How sad.
Russia saved kids, while your shithole country drones them.
Wars of aggression are bad. No matter who is doing them. In the past the US has done them, and that was bad. Now Russia is doing it and it is bad. You know this. Russia is in the wrong in this entire war. That's why you have to keep bringing up past western transgressions. Because you know this is a Russian war of conquest and you know it is wrong.
What? Do we finally agree?
But now it's cured of wars of aggression? Even though it wasn't ruling out invading the Solomon Islands if it were to allow a Chinese military base?
Russia is absolutely in the right. 30 years of provocations, expanding NATO even though you (= USG) promised you wouldn't, arming Ukraine in order to better terrorize the Russian population of the Donbas. Oh wait, those were good bombs and good cluster munitions fired into the city center of Donetsk. The West and its puppets can do no wrong, except in the past. It was one nanosecond ago, which means it doesn't count and Russian "war crimes" of saving children do. Love you guys, though I don't understand what you tell yourself to avoid cognitive dissonance.
That's why I have to bring up stuff that shows you to be the hypocrites that you are.
I don't recall American banks being sanctioned during one of its many wars of aggression, nor American athletes being banned from competing under what they call their flag. Huh, it's almost as if the state religion of the West is hypocrisy.
I think it's entirely right for Russia to reconquer lands it possessed for 200 years. The US didn't allow the Southern states to secede, did it? The only thing that saddens me is that so many people die (due to the actions of the regimes in the West), whether they are Russians or Ukrainians.
Ah yes, remember when NATO rolled tanks into Sweden and Finland and forced them to join? It's a volunteer organization my dude. This false equivalence is the most baffling zigger cope that I just can't figure out.
Maybe?
Oops, I guess not. Honestly your brain needs to be medically documented.
You .. you know the US fought a war of independence from an imperial power, right? The parallels to Ukraine are pretty strong.
If it's a 'volunteer organization', does that mean that no one is allowed to object to an aggressive, cluster bomb-using alliance moving to its borders? Well, ready yourself to use your excuse of "THAT WAS IN THE PAST" again, because I distinctly remember something called the Cuban Missile Crisis, my dude, where Cuba voluntarily allowed Soviet troops and missles on its territory, and your country threatened world annihilation over it.,
I guess you're now condemning your own Abe Lincoln.
The parallels between the US and Ukraine are extremely strong. A region of the country attempted to secede, and the central government took action and reconquered that area.
BTW, just noting that you were unable to offer a defense of your "volunteer organization" flooding Yugoslavia with cluster munitions. I guess "there wuz minez there already n sheeit" didn't fly there, and CNN hadn't told you what to say.
(don't take offense at my aggressive tone, however wrong you are about this, I know you're probably right about some other things or you wouldn't be here)