That's a lie. The moment I replied is the moment you decided to act in bad faith.
Its not, you took offense with something I said. I gave you back the literal definition (and called you a donkey). You can't just throw "bad faith" at everything that isn't to your debate club liking.
That's a lie as well. I never said my mind could never be changed, and nor did you.
Yes Captain Autism, its called an inference. Its when you take obvious meaning from a text that doesn't need to be directly said because its blatantly obvious what is going on behind the scenes. Because, as you pointed out, we've had these go ats before. Nothing was accomplished in them. I felt more secure in my position, and I cannot imagine yours changed closer to my POV either.
You can't claim some sort of special ownership over the replies to your comment, and wonder why someone you disagree with is allowed to respond.
Yes I anticipated you would respond with this. And I don't disagree with you on the principle.
But I'm also not the one whining about how someone responds to me, after initiating the conversation myself and noting how poorly it has gone the last few times. That's on you buddy, you can't complain then pull principle to justify eating shit while hating that it tastes like shit.
It is amusing though how you seem to be physically uncapable of accepting that I did you don't like and instead have to create some psychodrama where I am trying to "gaslight" you. While also trying to convince me that I don't actually believe my own opinions in the same sentence, which is some good irony I'm sure you won't get and will write 3 more paragraphs on how its okay when you do it because I'm a lying liar who lies.
That's another lie. I never said that it offended me, I simply disagreed with it. You responded with a reductive argument.
You can't just throw "bad faith" at everything that isn't to your debate club liking.
This is also another lie. You already admitted to acting in bad faith from the start.
This is what is so perplexing to me. You're lying about your own lies. That's not a normal behavior. I don't think you're a pathological liar, as I've actually interacted with you for years without incident prior to this. If you were a pathological liar, this would be a medical condition that we could all see. It would be a kind of schitzo-posting. You only just started acting like this in the past month or so. That's what confuses me. You're not normally like this, or at least you weren't.
its called an inference.
That's another lie. You didn't make any inferences, you were already acting in a hostile and bad faith manner by your own admission. From the first word of my response, you decided to take the most antagonistic path you could, and you've never deviated. If you were to make an inference, you would have had to have been taking in some facts or context. You didn't. This conversation has basically just been one way: you talking at me and refusing to engage honestly.
While also trying to convince me that I don't actually believe my own opinions in the same sentence
That's another lie. I thought I knew what your opinion was initially, which is why I disagreed with it. I don't really know what your opinions are at this point because you haven't been honest with me at all.
I never said that it offended me, I simply disagreed with it.
I'm sorry that your autism has reached such levels that you cannot even parse a sentence's meaning because you want to disagree with it some more.
You already admitted to acting in bad faith from the start.
No I admitted to saying I began doing so after I made my point and found your response lacking. You've just been accusing me of doing so from the start because you didn't like my first initial point.
You didn't make any inferences
Except I did. I inferred that this conversation would go nowhere productive, and that neither of our minds would budge by having it. Which Is why I put in no effort after I putting up my point (which still stands undefeated).
And lo, it didn't and no minds were changed. In fact, much like our previous conversations, I feel more secure in my position because of how this has gone.
I don't really know what your opinions are at this point because you haven't been honest with me at all.
You probably would, but you've spent so much time constructing me in your head that you've become too lost in the sauce to be able to even read the things I say. You are too busy rushing to call everything a lie and playing your victim card of "why you gaslighting me bro? :( I just wanna have a real conversation why you like this."
My opinion about Judaism not being just a religion hasn't changed in the slightest.
I ain't even gonna dignify that with an answer. If you want to start accusing me of that kind of bullshit, then you really are a narcissistic prick to think I would care that much about you.
Its not, you took offense with something I said. I gave you back the literal definition (and called you a donkey). You can't just throw "bad faith" at everything that isn't to your debate club liking.
Yes Captain Autism, its called an inference. Its when you take obvious meaning from a text that doesn't need to be directly said because its blatantly obvious what is going on behind the scenes. Because, as you pointed out, we've had these go ats before. Nothing was accomplished in them. I felt more secure in my position, and I cannot imagine yours changed closer to my POV either.
Yes I anticipated you would respond with this. And I don't disagree with you on the principle.
But I'm also not the one whining about how someone responds to me, after initiating the conversation myself and noting how poorly it has gone the last few times. That's on you buddy, you can't complain then pull principle to justify eating shit while hating that it tastes like shit.
It is amusing though how you seem to be physically uncapable of accepting that I did you don't like and instead have to create some psychodrama where I am trying to "gaslight" you. While also trying to convince me that I don't actually believe my own opinions in the same sentence, which is some good irony I'm sure you won't get and will write 3 more paragraphs on how its okay when you do it because I'm a lying liar who lies.
That's another lie. I never said that it offended me, I simply disagreed with it. You responded with a reductive argument.
This is also another lie. You already admitted to acting in bad faith from the start.
This is what is so perplexing to me. You're lying about your own lies. That's not a normal behavior. I don't think you're a pathological liar, as I've actually interacted with you for years without incident prior to this. If you were a pathological liar, this would be a medical condition that we could all see. It would be a kind of schitzo-posting. You only just started acting like this in the past month or so. That's what confuses me. You're not normally like this, or at least you weren't.
That's another lie. You didn't make any inferences, you were already acting in a hostile and bad faith manner by your own admission. From the first word of my response, you decided to take the most antagonistic path you could, and you've never deviated. If you were to make an inference, you would have had to have been taking in some facts or context. You didn't. This conversation has basically just been one way: you talking at me and refusing to engage honestly.
That's another lie. I thought I knew what your opinion was initially, which is why I disagreed with it. I don't really know what your opinions are at this point because you haven't been honest with me at all.
I'm sorry that your autism has reached such levels that you cannot even parse a sentence's meaning because you want to disagree with it some more.
No I admitted to saying I began doing so after I made my point and found your response lacking. You've just been accusing me of doing so from the start because you didn't like my first initial point.
Except I did. I inferred that this conversation would go nowhere productive, and that neither of our minds would budge by having it. Which Is why I put in no effort after I putting up my point (which still stands undefeated).
And lo, it didn't and no minds were changed. In fact, much like our previous conversations, I feel more secure in my position because of how this has gone.
You probably would, but you've spent so much time constructing me in your head that you've become too lost in the sauce to be able to even read the things I say. You are too busy rushing to call everything a lie and playing your victim card of "why you gaslighting me bro? :( I just wanna have a real conversation why you like this."
My opinion about Judaism not being just a religion hasn't changed in the slightest.
Just to make sure about something, you didn't create a fake account and start telling YesMovement to kill himself, right?
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16bj0fr4Uy/alex-stein-boxing-match-cancelle/c/4TvB6FgukIa
That would be fucked up to expand our issue to random people who did nothing wrong.
I ain't even gonna dignify that with an answer. If you want to start accusing me of that kind of bullshit, then you really are a narcissistic prick to think I would care that much about you.