Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

62
Is anything tested and approved since the 1980s actually safe? Or did we recruit too many diversity hires into our FDA? (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 2 years ago by IlhansBrother 2 years ago by IlhansBrother +62 / -0
50 comments download share
50 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– LauriThorne 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Except they're the same people

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BandageBandolier 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

That's a pretty hefty claim there... Just because people lack the technical language to describe the difference between a man-made chemical analogue and a natural product, doesn't mean they don't have the ability to understand there is a difference.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LauriThorne 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

This is just another form of climate alarmism and people who swallow whatever PETA tells them.

They genuinely don't understand the difference. People think sugar causes cancer, because cancer cells feed on sugar.

Every cell feeds on sugar.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BandageBandolier 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Whilst sugar is more specific than "chemical" it's still a pretty broad term, there are plenty of non-metabolizable oligosaccharides out there that none of your cells can use for respiration. And there are a couple that are generally non-metabolizable or processed at a low rate, but certain types of cancer uptake and process at a much higher rate (a fact used in some cancer treatments to help target said cancer cells specifically). Those could cause relative tumor proliferation in the bizarre situation where high proportionate consumption of those oligosaccharides is paired with a state of general starvation.

But again, being ignorant of the technical specifics does not automatically make one incapable of understanding or making rational judgements, just unfamiliar with the subject.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy