A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after Covid vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine – but the journal removed the study within 24 hours.
The study, a pre-print that was awaiting peer-review, is written by leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and their colleagues at the Wellness Company and was published online on Wednesday on the pre-print site of the prestigious medical journal.
However, less than 24 hours later, the study was removed and a note appeared stating: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” While the study had not undergone any part of the peer-review process, the note implies it fell foul of “screening criteria”.
This is bizarre. The Lancet removed a study that was awaiting peer review without explaining what was wrong with the methodology.
That is about as corrupt and fucked up as you can get in the scientific community.
Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.
Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.
This isn't even controversial, they spell out everything they did and it is all 100% methodologically sound.
I know we've seen a lot of bad stuff from the Lancet but this might be the worst yet.
This is bizarre. The Lancet removed a study that was awaiting peer review without explaining what was wrong with the methodology.
That is about as corrupt and fucked up as you can get in the scientific community.
This isn't even controversial, they spell out everything they did and it is all 100% methodologically sound.
I know we've seen a lot of bad stuff from the Lancet but this might be the worst yet.
Lancet showed they were willing to go full retard over ivermectin, they have had no credibility for years
Go back further - Wakefield might have been the earliest example
I was always of the belief that Wakefield was a fraud, but it turns out that there's more evidence linking vaccines and autism than I ever realized.
What the ever-loving fuck. Thank you for sharing.