I had this sort of argument with a (male) feminist claiming women can be just as good as men, nay! better even! at fighting, because they can compensate by better technique.
Well, the males can also improve their technique and destroy the female opponents.
Because men are physically superior. Something that is now taboo to say in certain circles, despite the very existence of women's divisions in sports tacitly admitting it is so.
Feminists will also cringe and reee if, after getting them to admit that, you point out chess and other sort of mental competitions have women's divisions too...
I've seen so many street interviews where they ask women what women are better at than men, and 9/10 are conditioned to answer, "everything!"
It's absurd how far removed from reality they are. Even though most of them probably don't actually believe that, they still have an insanely warped view of the differences between the two genders.
The thing they name the most besides "everything" is multi-tasking, but that's based on junk science and isn't even true.
It's all from Philosophers from the 60s and 70s trying to build women up with compliments. They don't mean the actual stuff men do, but today the entire statement is misused to the extreme.
The problem has been to lift women up, they have been denigrating men. So, now we have women convinced they can take on Juan, so they can take on Jamal.
But what if the men also train harder...?
I had this sort of argument with a (male) feminist claiming women can be just as good as men, nay! better even! at fighting, because they can compensate by better technique.
Well, the males can also improve their technique and destroy the female opponents.
Because men are physically superior. Something that is now taboo to say in certain circles, despite the very existence of women's divisions in sports tacitly admitting it is so.
Feminists will also cringe and reee if, after getting them to admit that, you point out chess and other sort of mental competitions have women's divisions too...
I've seen so many street interviews where they ask women what women are better at than men, and 9/10 are conditioned to answer, "everything!"
It's absurd how far removed from reality they are. Even though most of them probably don't actually believe that, they still have an insanely warped view of the differences between the two genders.
The thing they name the most besides "everything" is multi-tasking, but that's based on junk science and isn't even true.
It's all from Philosophers from the 60s and 70s trying to build women up with compliments. They don't mean the actual stuff men do, but today the entire statement is misused to the extreme.
The problem has been to lift women up, they have been denigrating men. So, now we have women convinced they can take on Juan, so they can take on Jamal.