Donbass & Crimea are within Ukraine's internationally recognized borders.
Who cares? Are you going to give back the western part of the US if the "international community" recognizes that you took them in a war of aggression?
No wait, rules-based international order, where the US makes the rules and gives out the orders.
This means he will need Ukraine's army to take them back by force
Like Lindsey Graham, you want to fight for the US empire there until the last Ukrainian.
He might as well try over the next several months
He might as well try, because it's not your life on the line.
I would happily give up the west coast from San Francisco to Seattle if we could find any other country willing to take them.
That's because you don't want them. It's got nothing to do with the "rules-based international order" or any of the other phony justifications provided by the USG for its actions.
Fact is that the only justification for the USG actions is the right of the stronger, and that's something that countries like Russia and China will resist.
Yes it's Ukraine's lives, and thus their choice to risk them for victory.
It's the choice of the ruling class which was installed by the US (and I know you deny all that, but no need to go over it again). I'm sure that if the USG commanded my government to go to war with China, they'd draft me and (at least try to) send me over to die for the empire. Is it my choice? No. Nor anyone's.
Like their fellow Nazis during World War II, they'd burn down the entire country and sacrifice everyone.
The RBIO exists because a large majority of countries agree with it, it isn't just imposed by the United States. The US is its biggest, but not sole, military enforcer.
I disagree with the RBIO & call it the WLLH "white left liberal hegemony", which is the more accurate term now post Cold War.
The RBIO exists because a large majority of countries agree with it, it isn't just imposed by the United States. The US is its biggest, but not sole, military enforcer.
Ah yes, the coalition of the bribed and the coerced. I do remember when you were bragging about all the countries who joined the US war of aggression against Iraq, specifically El Salvador. Methinks Bukele won't be doing things like that anymore.
I disagree with the RBIO & call it the WLLH "white left liberal hegemony", which is the more accurate term now post Cold War.
What's it supposed to mean other than "the US is always right"?
Who cares? Are you going to give back the western part of the US if the "international community" recognizes that you took them in a war of aggression?
No wait, rules-based international order, where the US makes the rules and gives out the orders.
Like Lindsey Graham, you want to fight for the US empire there until the last Ukrainian.
He might as well try, because it's not your life on the line.
I would happily give up the west coast from San Francisco to Seattle if we could find any other country willing to take them.
No, I'm just stating the obvious.
Yes it's Ukraine's lives, and thus their choice to risk them for victory.
That's because you don't want them. It's got nothing to do with the "rules-based international order" or any of the other phony justifications provided by the USG for its actions.
Fact is that the only justification for the USG actions is the right of the stronger, and that's something that countries like Russia and China will resist.
It's the choice of the ruling class which was installed by the US (and I know you deny all that, but no need to go over it again). I'm sure that if the USG commanded my government to go to war with China, they'd draft me and (at least try to) send me over to die for the empire. Is it my choice? No. Nor anyone's.
Like their fellow Nazis during World War II, they'd burn down the entire country and sacrifice everyone.
The RBIO exists because a large majority of countries agree with it, it isn't just imposed by the United States. The US is its biggest, but not sole, military enforcer.
I disagree with the RBIO & call it the WLLH "white left liberal hegemony", which is the more accurate term now post Cold War.
Ah yes, the coalition of the bribed and the coerced. I do remember when you were bragging about all the countries who joined the US war of aggression against Iraq, specifically El Salvador. Methinks Bukele won't be doing things like that anymore.
What's it supposed to mean other than "the US is always right"?