Geoengineering by stratospheric aerosol injection is by definition putting enough aerosol into the atmosphere to have a tangible effect on terrestrial albedo and global temperatures.
Normal volcanic eruptions don't do that, as you've already so painfully fixated on. Only super eruptions do that.
So more like:
You "It's just like shooting a gun"
Me "To have that effect you'd need a 'gun' that shoots 7 ton high explosive shells, we should be extra careful with that"
You "Haha people shoot guns all the time, wheeee, big gun go brrrr"
putting enough aerosol into the atmosphere to have a tangible effect on terrestrial albedo and global temperatures
Emphasis on the important part to help your comprehension.
Or are you really lining up to pivot to "stratospheric aerosol injections are safe because they don't do the one job they were designed to do"? Because that is as hilarious as it is embarrassing.
Oh look an eruption that just scrapes under the classification of supereruption, and an abberent eruption that released 10x more SO2 than is usual for an eruption of that size, and even then only had a local regional effect on temperatures because most of the SO2 didn't reach the stratosphere. (Local regional effects like killing 25% of the population of Iceland in a famine, so safe!)
What a stunning sample selection of one edge case and one misrepresentation of regional cooling as global cooling (and which was still disastrous)
You "you don't need a 7 ton shell, look, a 6 ton shell once barely did it. See, regular guns can do it too"
Geoengineering by stratospheric aerosol injection is by definition putting enough aerosol into the atmosphere to have a tangible effect on terrestrial albedo and global temperatures.
Normal volcanic eruptions don't do that, as you've already so painfully fixated on. Only super eruptions do that.
So more like:
You "It's just like shooting a gun"
Me "To have that effect you'd need a 'gun' that shoots 7 ton high explosive shells, we should be extra careful with that"
You "Haha people shoot guns all the time, wheeee, big gun go brrrr"
Are you thinking of lava flows? Normal volcanic eruptions get SO2 into the stratosphere (example).
Did you get your education only from memes? It's no wonder you're so afraid; ignorance is scary.
Emphasis on the important part to help your comprehension.
Or are you really lining up to pivot to "stratospheric aerosol injections are safe because they don't do the one job they were designed to do"? Because that is as hilarious as it is embarrassing.
Oh I read it just fine, dumb-dumb.
Normal volcano eruptions tangibly effect the global temperature. Volcanoes, not supervolcano eruption. That was a large eruption, sure, but the world didn't end. No mass extinction, not even close.
You should just man up and admit you were wrong about these things. It'll do wonders for your mental health to not have to pretend to yourself.
Oh look an eruption that just scrapes under the classification of supereruption, and an abberent eruption that released 10x more SO2 than is usual for an eruption of that size, and even then only had a local regional effect on temperatures because most of the SO2 didn't reach the stratosphere. (Local regional effects like killing 25% of the population of Iceland in a famine, so safe!)
What a stunning sample selection of one edge case and one misrepresentation of regional cooling as global cooling (and which was still disastrous)
You "you don't need a 7 ton shell, look, a 6 ton shell once barely did it. See, regular guns can do it too"