The state enacts The General Will through the Social Contract.
The General Will is decided by an election
If 50.0001% agree what The General Will is the State must enforce it by any means necessary, otherwise it violates The Social Contract.
Anyone refusing The General Will must be made to comply by any means necessary, because they are violating The Social Contract.
In a Democracy, the people are perfectly represented by the state through The General Will. This is the Social Contract that maintains Democracy: The People's State.
The people are the state and the state is the people.
"Deutschland ist Hitler, und Hitler ist Deutschland" = Perfect Democracy
...
You defied The General Will. SCOTUS defied The General Will. There is one and only one solution to your insurrection against The Social Contract, The General Will, the people, and the state.
Philosophical constraints don't stop them from whining about their rights as "oppressed minorities" and trying to tear down society when they are in the 49%.
They're just going off of Rousseau:
In a Democracy, the people are perfectly represented by the state through The General Will. This is the Social Contract that maintains Democracy: The People's State.
The people are the state and the state is the people.
"Deutschland ist Hitler, und Hitler ist Deutschland" = Perfect Democracy
...
You defied The General Will. SCOTUS defied The General Will. There is one and only one solution to your insurrection against The Social Contract, The General Will, the people, and the state.
Hitler was a Socialist, not a German Catholic.
If he had any interest in German Catholicism, he would have joined the Catholic Centre Party, not the NSDAP.
Why did he build a state that displaced worship of God with worship of the state, and Gobbels "Aryanism" pseudo-religious psycho-babble?
Philosophical constraints don't stop them from whining about their rights as "oppressed minorities" and trying to tear down society when they are in the 49%.