I hate lolicon and I would never crusade against this. It's such a contrived intrusion into fiction, like the "droids rights" character in the Solo trash fire
Yeah, lolis are one thing (which I won't touch with a ten foot poll; any debate around that usually turns into a thread-consuming dumpster fire), but sexy animated sixteen year olds are completely different.
I'm not going to defend real life underage sexualization (there was one dude around a few months back trying to convince people that real life fifteen year old are totally hot, trust me, and used photo evidence...a little sus, to say the least), but I've got no qualms about defending hot animated fictional sixteen year olds.
As you said, it's contrived intrusion into fiction. You can tack any age onto any made up character, as evidenced by the aforementioned 700 year old child vampires. Outrage over an "underage" but adult-presenting animation is either retard outrage, or faux outrage to manipulate and guilt people into agreeing with you.
I hate lolicon and I would never crusade against this. It's such a contrived intrusion into fiction, like the "droids rights" character in the Solo trash fire
Yeah, lolis are one thing (which I won't touch with a ten foot poll; any debate around that usually turns into a thread-consuming dumpster fire), but sexy animated sixteen year olds are completely different.
I'm not going to defend real life underage sexualization (there was one dude around a few months back trying to convince people that real life fifteen year old are totally hot, trust me, and used photo evidence...a little sus, to say the least), but I've got no qualms about defending hot animated fictional sixteen year olds.
As you said, it's contrived intrusion into fiction. You can tack any age onto any made up character, as evidenced by the aforementioned 700 year old child vampires. Outrage over an "underage" but adult-presenting animation is either retard outrage, or faux outrage to manipulate and guilt people into agreeing with you.