Most people just leave when they want to leave. But that's my point. I've been around here for 3 years and nobody has ever said they left because of AoV or Jester.
Most of the people who they get into grudge matches with stay here. Instead, I've had people go back to Reddit, because it was easier to deal with that, then to deal with jew-haters being utterly incessant. A lot of people end up just doing both, because they don't want to deal with the incessant, but occasional jew hatred. They know which thread are going to be populated by ConPro aficionados, and just avoid them.
So if enough people came to you whining about the homophobia and racism and transphobia causing them to stop posting, you would consider it a real problem?
It can be. It depends on whether or not there are activist factions wholly dedicated to derailing entire forums into one and only one topic, particularly with a Leftist bent.
Put it like this: I put up that "5 post maximum" rule 3 years ago because a Tulsi Gabbard shill account and Andrenal were posting 30-50 posts a day, combined. I actually had to take action there because they were derailing the entire fucking sub to a point that was out of control. People couldn't even find their own posts. They acquiesced to it and life improved. There are dedicated efforts to push shit that destroys forums. I don't care about basic opinions of individuals, but the insane collectivist action and mind-virus level the behavior of racial progressives is something different than just an opinion.
The fact that you typed 5 paragraphs to justify yourself and bend into fucking knots about how some people just don't deserve the same rights as others because they might be problematic, should be a wake up call to yourself about how lost in the sauce you are.
People pushing those oppositional-dialectics aren't just "some people". They are ideologically possessed lunatics on a rampage. If they were normal people, they'd work within the rules. It really isn't that hard. Several of them do because they aren't total fucking retards. The rest are so ideologically driven by this oppositional-dialectic that they will never act outside of it, in defiance to it, and will only interpret all information within it.
Leftists aren't people, not as we normally understand them to be. They are literally possessed by an ideology. Even a shill makes more sense.
Instead, I've had people go back to Reddit, because it was easier to deal with that, then to deal with jew-haters being utterly incessant
And I left KIA2 reddit because the leftovers there were insufferable hugboxes. Does my opinion count? Does this problem deserve special exception attention? Or is it again, only in this one topic where it gets special exception attention?
It depends on whether or not there are activist factions wholly dedicated to derailing entire forums into one
So now its all a huge conspiracy to take over. Very rational. Just like every single person who downvotes Imp is a ConPro shill following him around to derail his gospel.
I actually had to take action there because they were derailing the entire fucking sub to a point that was out of control. People couldn't even find their own posts.
That's an apolitical action. It has no personal bias and is applied evenly and fairly. Which is all I want to get to the bottom of. Why is this topic so special beyond "because it is."
They are ideologically possessed lunatics on a rampage.
So when is there going to be an active action taken against misogyny then? Because everything you said applies to Imp, and myself to a more restrained amount. Again, everything you say makes sense but its only applied on this one topic.
I'm not a stormfag, and my posting and browsing would change almost 0% if it was all banned. I simply cannot stand inconsistency.
Does my opinion count? Does this problem deserve special exception attention? Or is it again, only in this one topic where it gets special exception attention?
Does any of what you said relate to an meta-narrative built on an oppositional-dialectic? No.
Not to mention, Forum Sliding is ConPro's literal goal. It's what they do, and they measure success on that. The incessant behavior is the point.
I'm sorry that it works on you, but know that there is only darkness down the path you are going to go. Black-pilling self-destruction and racist rage addiction is the only endpoint.
So now its all a huge conspiracy to take over.
A conspiracy would have to have some sort of internal organized attempt at a criminal act. This is more like The Great Reset: people with identical ideological alignments working with each other to create a systemic change.
That's an apolitical action. It has no personal bias and is applied evenly and fairly. Which is all I want to get to the bottom of. Why is this topic so special beyond "because it is."
I don't see oppositional-dialectics like this to be about any particular option or viewpoint. The framework is the issue.
Why do you think I'm not banning racists and incels, but did have to ban Imp and some of the WN's? Why do you think some of them stayed? They stayed because even they know they are not going to be banned for racism. They're banned for the meta-narrative. I can't find the example now, but in one of the threads they mentioned me on, they complain that I let them be racist, but I never let them "connect the dots". Which is precisely the point. Their narrative doesn't get around the world because it is structured incorrectly. It will never be constructed correctly. Nor will any Leftist meta-narrative.
So when is there going to be an active action taken against misogyny then? Because everything you said applies to Imp, and myself to a more restrained amount. Again, everything you say makes sense but its only applied on this one topic.
He's banned right now because he wouldn't stop. Have you argued that women are an enemy demographic of some sort, or that they are innately inferior? If you had, that's what's going to get you.
Not to mention, Forum Sliding is ConPro's literal goal. It's what they do, and they measure success on that. The incessant behavior is the point.
Of course. That's why its only noticeable on a single person who is plenty unlikable on their own to get downvotes by the truckload completely irrelevant of whatever they do.
This is more like The Great Reset
Right, because when it might accidentally sound like you agree with the Stormfags it ceases to be a proper noun entity and becomes "some people (who magically are exactly aligned) did something."
Like, I truly do not give two shits about Jews or whatever they might be doing. But you really are doing a terrible job arguing your point beyond stating the same thing over and over of "stormfags are special and super duper evil, they are so powerful man you don't even know! every rule and thought must be especially built around them!"
Have you argued that women are an enemy demographic of some sort, or that they are innately inferior?
Yes many times. I even intentionally ramped up doing so a few months back. I simply am not a raving lunatic, so people don't immediately hate me and rush to report every comment I have.
That's why its only noticeable on a single person who is plenty unlikable on their own to get downvotes by the truckload completely irrelevant of whatever they do.
When I've seen ConPro posts about us, many of the users are talking about the importance of pushing their narrative, even down to literally using the term "Forum Sliding".
you really are doing a terrible job arguing your point beyond stating the same thing over and over of "stormfags are special and super duper evil, they are so powerful man you don't even know! every rule and thought must be especially built around them!"
You're not getting my point. They aren't any more special than Communists. You first claimed I was saying they themselves were a secret cabal. They're not; they're operating off of systemic aggression to push their meta-narrative. Now you're saying that they're entirely unique, but I keep telling you that they are Leftists and they are doing what all Leftists do: pushing the meta-narrative for ideological conquest.
They operate like anyone else who is an ideologically possessed zealot.
Yes many times. I even intentionally ramped up doing so a few months back.
Well, I typically won't take actions if I don't see them. Why don't you show me one. I will not punish you for showing me comments, as this is for demonstration purposes. I'll explain my approach and response.
Most people just leave when they want to leave. But that's my point. I've been around here for 3 years and nobody has ever said they left because of AoV or Jester.
Most of the people who they get into grudge matches with stay here. Instead, I've had people go back to Reddit, because it was easier to deal with that, then to deal with jew-haters being utterly incessant. A lot of people end up just doing both, because they don't want to deal with the incessant, but occasional jew hatred. They know which thread are going to be populated by ConPro aficionados, and just avoid them.
It can be. It depends on whether or not there are activist factions wholly dedicated to derailing entire forums into one and only one topic, particularly with a Leftist bent.
Put it like this: I put up that "5 post maximum" rule 3 years ago because a Tulsi Gabbard shill account and Andrenal were posting 30-50 posts a day, combined. I actually had to take action there because they were derailing the entire fucking sub to a point that was out of control. People couldn't even find their own posts. They acquiesced to it and life improved. There are dedicated efforts to push shit that destroys forums. I don't care about basic opinions of individuals, but the insane collectivist action and mind-virus level the behavior of racial progressives is something different than just an opinion.
People pushing those oppositional-dialectics aren't just "some people". They are ideologically possessed lunatics on a rampage. If they were normal people, they'd work within the rules. It really isn't that hard. Several of them do because they aren't total fucking retards. The rest are so ideologically driven by this oppositional-dialectic that they will never act outside of it, in defiance to it, and will only interpret all information within it.
Leftists aren't people, not as we normally understand them to be. They are literally possessed by an ideology. Even a shill makes more sense.
And I left KIA2 reddit because the leftovers there were insufferable hugboxes. Does my opinion count? Does this problem deserve special exception attention? Or is it again, only in this one topic where it gets special exception attention?
So now its all a huge conspiracy to take over. Very rational. Just like every single person who downvotes Imp is a ConPro shill following him around to derail his gospel.
That's an apolitical action. It has no personal bias and is applied evenly and fairly. Which is all I want to get to the bottom of. Why is this topic so special beyond "because it is."
So when is there going to be an active action taken against misogyny then? Because everything you said applies to Imp, and myself to a more restrained amount. Again, everything you say makes sense but its only applied on this one topic.
I'm not a stormfag, and my posting and browsing would change almost 0% if it was all banned. I simply cannot stand inconsistency.
Does any of what you said relate to an meta-narrative built on an oppositional-dialectic? No.
Not to mention, Forum Sliding is ConPro's literal goal. It's what they do, and they measure success on that. The incessant behavior is the point.
I'm sorry that it works on you, but know that there is only darkness down the path you are going to go. Black-pilling self-destruction and racist rage addiction is the only endpoint.
A conspiracy would have to have some sort of internal organized attempt at a criminal act. This is more like The Great Reset: people with identical ideological alignments working with each other to create a systemic change.
I don't see oppositional-dialectics like this to be about any particular option or viewpoint. The framework is the issue.
Why do you think I'm not banning racists and incels, but did have to ban Imp and some of the WN's? Why do you think some of them stayed? They stayed because even they know they are not going to be banned for racism. They're banned for the meta-narrative. I can't find the example now, but in one of the threads they mentioned me on, they complain that I let them be racist, but I never let them "connect the dots". Which is precisely the point. Their narrative doesn't get around the world because it is structured incorrectly. It will never be constructed correctly. Nor will any Leftist meta-narrative.
He's banned right now because he wouldn't stop. Have you argued that women are an enemy demographic of some sort, or that they are innately inferior? If you had, that's what's going to get you.
Of course. That's why its only noticeable on a single person who is plenty unlikable on their own to get downvotes by the truckload completely irrelevant of whatever they do.
Right, because when it might accidentally sound like you agree with the Stormfags it ceases to be a proper noun entity and becomes "some people (who magically are exactly aligned) did something."
Like, I truly do not give two shits about Jews or whatever they might be doing. But you really are doing a terrible job arguing your point beyond stating the same thing over and over of "stormfags are special and super duper evil, they are so powerful man you don't even know! every rule and thought must be especially built around them!"
Yes many times. I even intentionally ramped up doing so a few months back. I simply am not a raving lunatic, so people don't immediately hate me and rush to report every comment I have.
When I've seen ConPro posts about us, many of the users are talking about the importance of pushing their narrative, even down to literally using the term "Forum Sliding".
You're not getting my point. They aren't any more special than Communists. You first claimed I was saying they themselves were a secret cabal. They're not; they're operating off of systemic aggression to push their meta-narrative. Now you're saying that they're entirely unique, but I keep telling you that they are Leftists and they are doing what all Leftists do: pushing the meta-narrative for ideological conquest.
They operate like anyone else who is an ideologically possessed zealot.
Well, I typically won't take actions if I don't see them. Why don't you show me one. I will not punish you for showing me comments, as this is for demonstration purposes. I'll explain my approach and response.